Cathardincu
Surprisingly incoherent and boring
ReaderKenka
Let's be realistic.
Pluskylang
Great Film overall
Billie Morin
This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows
hoalequynh
This plot of this movie is piece of crap. No logic in this film like wth?????? the ghost in "the conjuring" is nothing compared to this "amazing Mikey" wthhhhh? the way she killed her ghost exhusband is so wth? and the end, and then what happens next???? I don't think you should waste your time watching this crap
areatw
Avoid this so-called 'horror' film at all costs, unless you want a lesson in how not to act. It would be harsh to pin the blame for an overall poor film on the lead actress, but Famke Janssen did not suit this role at all. It was almost like she was embarrassed to be seen in this film.'100 Feet' is a low-budget horror and it certainly shows. The special effects are incredibly cheap and the ghost of the husband isn't remotely scary. The fact that the film virtually relies on the ghost scenes for the majority of its scares, you can imagine just how scary it is.. not at all.
fedor8
One wedding ring to rule them all, one wedding ring to find them, one wedding ring to bring them all to my house and torture them with my demonic super-powers.Yes, it's a silly movie. It starts off well enough, but the stupidity curve rises exponentially, until the Great Ring of Power destroys the evil demon.The movie's message is basically this: if you lead a wicked life, you will be rewarded by God in the after-life by being given demonic super-powers. Furthermore, you won't be sent to Hell, but get to stay in your house where you can do as you please with anyone who enters it. Famke's ex isn't a ghost; he is a demon. For all practical purposes, his ex has all the powers of Satan in "The Exorcist" times 100. The inevitable conclusion: if you're evil and you die violently trying to kill your long-suffering wife, you get REWARDED in the after-life by having more super-human strength than all the Marvel Comics clowns combined. Your husband beats you? Get the f*** out of the marriage. Leave him. Famke plays one of those masochist wives who endure their husbands' violent behavior for eons until they finally decide to do something about it. I have very little pity for such women. Sure, she eventually made a move to divorce him – which set off the chain of events that got her incarcerated. Nevertheless, any sane and/or smart woman will leave her hubby if he so much as hits her once. This especially goes for women who have no children with the sadist in question. Famke had no reason whatsoever (aside from latent masochism) to stay with the corrupt cop so long, so why should we the audience pity her? Not me.What truly made the movie laughable was the astonishing decision to turn the loot over to a CATHOLIC PRIEST – after which he spontaneously offered her that whole silly confession shtick with her (after which he went back home, got some beers out of the fridge, and Googled "yacht prices"). Rather than give the money to the richest and most powerful sect in the world, it would have made more sense for her to hand it over to that juvenile delinquent kid, help set him straight. Instead, she gets him killed. 100F breaks all the unwritten ghost rules. There is a REASON why ghosts don't behave like Rocky or Rambo and beat the living daylights out of their enemies: because it's stupid and banal. Famke's dead husband is in effect PHYSICALLY present in the house, not as a mere windy apparition but simply as a transparent human; that's what it boils down to, and it's pretty tacky. So death means becoming invisible – yet capable of physical interaction? Again, I am reminded of the movie's idiotic implication that criminals and sadists get REWARDED for their misdeeds rather than punished.Almost as laughable is that nonsense about Famke's "Ghost Ejection Manual" or whatever the hell it's called, and its instructions to "get rid of all the possessions of the deceased". Just one question: what EXACTLY constitutes "personal belongings" in the ghost world? Is the fork Famke's husband used to eat with considered a "personal possession"? The toilet seat? After all, both of them used it, so she should be ridding the house of the toilet seat as well, right? Where the hell do you draw the line between personal possessions and not-personal possessions? Are the walls of the house his personal possessions too?Speaking of which; when she realizes that she still has their wedding ring, she stupidly throws it in the sink – knowing full well he controls EVERYTHING in the house, including the machinery. Why not just throw it out the window or give it to the kid? Predictably (and I mean extremely predictably), getting rid of all that money does not get rid of the ghost, which makes Famke look pretty stupid - yet again.The ghost eventually kills the kid (in an unsuitably over-sadistic scene), and the cops raid the house at almost the EXACT moment the ghost finishes killing him. Great (Hollywood) timing, huh? Apparently, aside from having immense supernatural powers, ghosts of dead criminals also possess hypnotic abilities and send orders telepathically to law-enforcement officers.I find it interesting that Famke was able to simply catch a bus, surrounded by all these people who must have seen her face in the news. And yet, some way or other, she manages to abscond into obscurity. How very dumb. The movie's idiocy is relentless and follows us all the way to the end-credits. One of the dumbest haunted-house flicks ever made.
MLTIER
First of all the only good acting was done by Famke Janssen (Marnie Watson) otherwise the acting was horrid, (Shanks) played by Bobby Cannavale did poorly. The special effects looked like they were made off a high schooler's iPad. The Story had potential, it was a good sounding plot, fairly unique but the movie failed to deliver. The characters were not believable, and the writer did not do their research well. For one, I could never imagine a lady like Famke sleeping with a grocery delivery boy who she has 20 years on. The murdered cops partner would not be allowed to handle the case nor be in charge of an electronic monitoring system, And if I ever saw what I thought was a ghost, I would not care if I was on house arrest, I would be sitting on that front porch. The ending.... hmm, the whole ending sequence was bad, again, the CGI was bad, the part where Joey fell through the ceiling was good, but when Michael Pare (The Ghost) came out, it got stupid, Cannavale's character acted poorly as a hurt person, it was very dramatic and cheesy. The whole ring throwing scene was embarrassing. I don't know, I've been watching horror movies for 27 years, big fan of the genre, I read user reviews for this movie and decided to give it a chance. In fact this is my first review, I decided to write a review because I was shocked to see lots of people favoring this movie. Anyway I would give it a 1.5 stars, The plot was good, Famke was good, overall the movie sucked, I would like to put a restraining order on this film.