RipDelight This is a tender, generous movie that likes its characters and presents them as real people, full of flaws and strengths.

Ogosmith Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.

Stephanie There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

Staci Frederick Blistering performances.

net3431 Never dull, always alive with authentic and rich scenes; unpredictable and interesting. The wooden acting of the leads is appropriate for two young people who are fresh out into the world. They are surrounded by an extravagant variety of characters of the late Middle Ages, all well portrayed and decently acted. The scenery is picturesque, the music is lilting and fair, and the plot veers between barbarisms and nobility. It has been beautifully filmed and the direction keeps the plot moving briskly. There is no fat, no wasted scenes, no stupidity. The story is believable and moving, a story of sensitive youths trying to survive in a world suddenly gone mad. The creatures who seek such chaos are trying to turn the world upside down; they seek their own order through chaos. They seek to rearrange the world into their own hideous image. This is a story of how civilized people deal with the carnage of progress.

Jonathon Dabell I thought the title A Walk With Love And Death might be a metaphor – that the "walk" might stand for a journey or a quest, or perhaps even someone's lifetime, with various romances and fatalities along the way. In fact, the title is an absolutely literal description of what the film is about - the story follows a disillusioned student in the Middle Ages as he walks to the sea, encountering love and death en route. It is a very picaresque story, similar to the books that Tobias Smollett was writing in the 18th century (though in this case it is based on a novel by 20th century Dutch novelist Hans Koninsberger). John Huston is the unlikely director behind it, and he brings a modern sensibility to the proceedings – his film is more concerned with Flower-Power, Peace & Love and the 60s Youth Movement than the barbarism of the Middle Ages.During the Hundred Years War, student Heron of Fois (Assi Dayan) marches out of a lecture in Paris and decides to walk across his war-torn country to the sea. It is a long trek, and even though it takes him through beautiful landscapes there are constant reminders of the scars of war. Dead bodies drift by in rivers, cattle lies slaughtered in the fields and castles burn on the horizon. During the trip Heron meets a beautiful young noble-woman, Claudia (Anjelica Huston), who eventually joins him on his journey to the sea. Neither of them has ever set eyes on the sea before, but both share a foolish dream that if they can somehow get there all their problems will be resolved. However, the land becomes increasingly dangerous as peasant armies rise up in revolt against the soldiery, and the young companions gradually realise that their quest is doomed to fail.Huston's film is very personal, too much so to be a commercial success at the time. Having said that, some of the remarkably negative reviews that have been written about it are hardly fair. It is true that the story is very minor and insubstantial; it is true that the two leads are awfully wooden in their roles; it is true too that Dayan's character is completely unbelievable in a Middle Ages setting with his saintly "make-peace-not-war" attitude. Yet in spite of these flaws, there are still things to enjoy in A Walk With Love And Death. It is a beautifully shot film, with eye-catching colours and backgrounds captured in luscious DeLuxe by Ted Scaife (of The Dirty Dozen and Khartoum). Georges Delerue provides a haunting score, and Huston generates some fairly realistic scenes of hysteria and combat (one sequence, in which a man is quartered, is notably gruesome, albeit in a non-gratuitous way). While the film is not in the very top tier of the director's work, it certainly doesn't deserve to have been neglected as much as it has. It is perhaps best summed up as a worthy flop.

dbdumonteil ....through the MIddle Ages in France.A voice over warns us: this is the story of a boy and a girl.Something had begun (the Hundred Years War):they had not seen the beginning and they would not see the end.Who would anyway? It takes place in France and it was not meant to be realistic;its closest relatives are arguably Bergman's "the seventh seal" (1957) and Marcel Carné's "les Visiteurs du soir"(1942) .The three works are fables ,the MIddle-Age being an alibi- ,and the three of them feature a stunning ending:the dance macabre in the Bergman's work,the hearts still beating in stone in Carné's and the "return to the sea" in this one.Many of the permanent features of the great director emerge in "Walk": the odd pair (Assaf Dayan is childlike ,naive and chivalrous whereas Huston -who was only eighteen- seems a mature woman who still believes in a society which would survive till 1789! those who fight,those who pray and those who work),the absurdity of any quest (what's good going to Paris?the heroine says.What's good escaping again?),the presence of death (which predates Huston's last film -the Dead- by fifteen years;and A.Huston is in that film too),the stranglehold religion had on the minds and on the souls .The 1965-1975 years were a period of barren inspiration for Huston,they say,but it did provide at least two masterworks :the underrated overlooked "Reflection in a golden eye" which is looked upon as a classic in France and which was very faithful to McCullers' novel and the grandiose "Man who would be king" ."A walk with Love and Death " is second only to these ,being more original than "fat city" and beating hands down the harmless "sinful Davy" and the muddled "Kremlin letter" and "Mackintosh Man" .Beautiful luminous cinematography.

LilyDaleLady This is a fairly dry, low budget medieval picture by John Huston and starring his daughter Angelica...LOOOONG before she emerged as one of our great actresses. She's very awkward here, and the role is awkwardly written and the whole thing simply doesn't work.I have read some things Angelica herself wrote about this film -- that her father was often not active in her life, and that he wanted to do this film to sort of make things up to her, i.e., allow her to star in something he was doing. Also, that it was made to some degree to piggy-back on the popularity of Zeffirelli's '68 "Romeo and Juliet", which created a brief interest in romance films in medieval settings. That makes perfect sense, but the film "A Walk with Love and Death" doesn't work on any of those levels, unfortunately.A rather sad waste of some amazing talent. Knowing what Angelica has become, you have to wonder what she could have done acting-wise under different circumstances. Also, it's particularly unkind to cast a young woman of her looks -- interesting, but harsh and definitely not "pretty" -- in this sort of role, where her lack of prettiness seems at odds with the character. You can't help but feel sorry for her here! You can file this one under "every dad thinks his daughter is beautiful", right next to Sophie Coppola's debut in "Godfather 3". (And nothing against either amazingly talented lady, but this further proves that nepotism not only is a bad idea, but IT DOESN'T WORK.)