SanEat
A film with more than the usual spoiler issues. Talking about it in any detail feels akin to handing you a gift-wrapped present and saying, "I hope you like it -- It's a thriller about a diabolical secret experiment."
Edison Witt
The first must-see film of the year.
Mandeep Tyson
The acting in this movie is really good.
Ginger
Very good movie overall, highly recommended. Most of the negative reviews don't have any merit and are all pollitically based. Give this movie a chance at least, and it might give you a different perspective.
Irishchatter
I really enjoyed the movie but it was rather sad y'know. It would give you great shocks like the pauper Selina Dawes betraying her lover Margaret Prior who is an aristocrat. Then Margaret committing suicide in the end because of the betrayal and the fact, her family wasn't very supportive with her choices. I felt like I would give the mother a slap across the face, she was such a horrible vile woman to her daughter! The brother wasn't even a help either, he just thought he could own everything the family owns! He was pure selfish too!The movie also makes you angry too for the people that hurt Margaret. I thought that Selina one was better then that. She was such a cow, I'll never get over the fact she just took everything belonging to Margaret!Very good story which reflects life during the 1800's, well done BBC!
zugurudumba
I tremendously enjoyed Tipping the Velvet and Fingersmith and I was looking forward to another adaptation of Sarah Waters' novels. Affinity, unfortunately, did not deliver.The storytelling felt a little bit rushed and I constantly had the feeling of missing important plot elements. At times, I was sorry for not reading the book before watching the movie.I did not quite like the acting of Zoe Tapper and I could not relate to her character. The final "twist" was not a twist at all for me, as I was telling myself since halfway into the movie that Selina is a scam and is into Margaret just to get herself out of the prison.The character of Margaret Prior almost negated my suspension of disbelief, as I tried to understand her infatuation with Selina, and failed. The filmmakers did not offer me enough reasons for a love story, enough reasons to care for this woman's feelings.Only watch this if you're a fan of Sarah Waters.
chflindt
Affinity was the television low point of Christmas 2008. It seemed to have been thrown together at the last minute, with jarring editing, terrible sound balances, and a script that seemed to have been put together by a cliché-filled computer. Everything seemed wrong - the men's facial hair, the extras' wooden street-walking, the dreadful music, the sheer repetitiveness (we turned it into a drinking game: one finger for 'walks nervously through prison gates', two fingers for 'walks nervously into cell'; we all got very drunk.) I loathe wobbly-cam shots, trying to watch characters as they bounce around the screen in a haphazard fashion, but occasionally, it can be bearable - Bourne, for instance. 'Affinity' was not the place for wobbly-cams, especially when they are mixed - seemingly at random - with steady shots. I hate to ask it, because he is supposed to have TV's Midas Touch, but is Andrew Davies entering 'Emperor's New Clothes' territory?
hudiefanny
No doubt this is definitely not the best movie adopted from Sarah Waters' works, as far as I'm concerned. However, it's also not at the bottom of the list. I kind of like this dramatic plot but strongly detest the false ending.Similar to Fingersmith, Affinity is a story of skin game. A woman plans to acquire her own freedom or even happy life on the sacrifice of another miserable woman. The swindler commits her scheme successfully through all the lies and deceptions. But there's no winner in Sarah Waters' stories. Huge price is paid. The conspiracy costs too much, purity, clear conscience, and maybe more.The victim of Affinity, Margaret, was at the tragic focus. Living in a traditional society and a high-brow community, she found herself homosexual. Her secret lesbian lover, Helen, betrayed her and it made things even worse that Helen married her brother and made herself Margaret's sister-in-all. The only consolation left to Margaret was a strand of hair in her necklace lock. She kept all her secrets there and in her diary. Six months after her father's death, she was offered a job in Milbank Jail as a lady-visitor. There, she ran into her destiny, Celina.Celina was sentenced to a four-year imprisonment. But the movie generously provides scenes to support her claim of innocence. Margaret devoted her curiosity, compassion, and finally her affection to this so-called affinity, which turns out to be beguilement in disguise.Celina fled away with her real partner Vigers in a ship while Margaret committed suicide by drowning herself in the river. The ending would be prefect if it just stopped here or at most with Celina's inexplicable tear drops. The illusionary intimacy in water and Celina unquenchable grief which aroused Vigers' strong reproof "Remember whose girl you are" are really too much.Is the affinity between them real or just a lie? I would like to make it unknown if I were the film director, because it is unknown. Who could tell for sure that Margaret killed herself out of nothing else but losing her one love of lifetime? She was desperate, when she was cheated for the second time, when she was given the last straw and taken away immediately after, when she lost everything she had, her money, her wooer, her hope for a brand new life. I cannot deny that she had a crush on Celina, but was it true love without any impurity? And as to the adorable puppet and great performer, Celina, who knows who her real affinity was? They were far away from affinity, not even close.I haven't read this original novel yet so that I don't know whose idea it is to fake or at least exaggerate their love in the end. Sarah Waters, probably. She's too merciful. Maybe that's true that she worked out Fingersmith years later to compensate the sadness of this tragedy. It's a much better work.Most of Sarah Waters' protagonists are lesbians. But I think she's intended to tell more than homoerotism. She writes about people. Women, especially the homosexual ones, are the most sensitive and sophisticated group of all. Sarah Waters makes her novels a stage, to reveal their, or to be more accurately, our life, love, desire, solitude, and the darkness in the deepest of our hearts. Lesbians are the representatives rather than all her subjects.As one of the woman audience, I've seen myself mirrored in her work, more or less. And I've been seeking for the solution of life from her masterpieces. Have I found the answer? No, I haven't. I don't know if I can or if anyone else can. I even cannot tell for sure whether there's something like that in her creations or in this world. But one thing is certain that Sarah Waters tells us through her stories: Affinity may not find us some way out. But deception absolutely leads to destruction and corruption.