filippaberry84 I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

Brennan Camacho Mostly, the movie is committed to the value of a good time.

Bob This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

Skyler Great movie. Not sure what people expected but I found it highly entertaining.

Leofwine_draca BAD VS. WORSE is a cheapjack US horror film made in New York. It's about a trio of no-good hoods who decide to rob a house little realising that it's currently occupied by a serial killer busy torturing his latest victim. What follows will surprise nobody who has previously seen THE COLLECTOR, of which this is a big rip-off.Given that this is a zero budget production, BAD VS. WORSE has virtually nothing to offer the viewer. There's a lot of scenes involving people being held in captivity but not much in the way of bloodshed and certainly no atmosphere. Some of the dialogue tries to be funny but fails every time. The camera-work ranges between the bad and the occasionally good, but overall this is a time waster.

blumdeluxe I watched "Bad vs. Worse" because I found the general story-line quite interesting. It could be a nice concept to see "the bad guys" suddenly becoming confronted with something much more sinister.Unfortunately, I have to say that this one is really for Splatter fans only. There isn't much of a story actually, it's more or less one big fight from near the beginning until the end. It manages to create an atmosphere you clearly don't want to face yourself but in the end it becomes kind of replaceable by relying heavily on mere physical violence.In my opinion you could have made quite a decent film out of it through some more character development and background story that makes it easier to identify with or understand the protagonists. As it is, the audience at times gets confronted with decisions that are quite surprising, such as not just leaving the house when there was still a chance to do so or returning to the house once you seem to have escaped.If you like Splatter movies, I think you will have some fun with this one. It is not total trash but I saw something in it that's not really there.

arfdawg-1 The Plot.A young man persuades his younger brother into robbing a chain of houses with them. Unfortunately for them, one of the houses on their list belongs to a sadistic serial killer.Once again, the only super review on IMDb is from a guy who only reviewed this film -- in other words, he worked on it.The movie is VERY amateurishly directed. The acting is pretty poor overall.The only saving grace is the basic story which is interesting but not enough to compel you to stick through this movie.Too bad. Would have been way better in the hands of a director who knew how to sustain the tension.

Robin-Anderson9991 Mixing in the current trend of home invasion with elements of horror, "Bad vs Worse" tells the exploits of three amateur robbers getting in a situation that, as the title implies, goes from "bad" to "worse."When the trio finds themselves in the house of a serial killer by accident, things quickly speedup to all the blood and nightmare inducing antics you would expect from a genre horror film such as this; knives, chainsaws, torture, etc, it's all here. In this way, the film pulls an interesting reversal of having the "predators" in the form of the robbers, become the "prey" when compared to their serial killing overlord.Ultimately, I can see fans of shows like "Dexter" or "Saw" liking an indie horror flick such as this. The film was definitely made on a budget, but fans of the genre will find something to like in this piece.