Phonearl Good start, but then it gets ruined

SparkMore n my opinion it was a great movie with some interesting elements, even though having some plot holes and the ending probably was just too messy and crammed together, but still fun to watch and not your casual movie that is similar to all other ones.

Hadrina The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

Ella-May O'Brien Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.

M MALIK this is it this director should be given a chance to direct a doom video game if they ever rebooted it i absolutely love that game this director Joel Schumacher is one of the best i have seen most people hate him for ruining batman in 90s but i believe he likes over the top stuff when telling his stories and distances himself from reality.this film town creek or blood creek is one crazy film its got a unexpected cast & narrative actors like Henry Cavil & Michael Fassbender are highlights specially Fassbender he plays a psycho immortal villain trying to kill everyone his makeup is total scary he crept me out his good acting skills are added bonus.i agree with reviewers here this film is bloody disgusting at many points it includes animal violence a dog is killed by knife & horse gets shot multiple time still he wont die due to magic on him by the bad guy but here is the catch the film is not scary at all in fact its funny as it takes itself way to seriously it could have been a better film if the villain won sadly he looses.the pace is slow it does move forward with a decent speed half an hour i hated the ending the bad guy was about to become more powerful he was already creating havoc the big problem here is that it mixed it too many genre in one like Nazi,Hitler,witch craft,occult along with hostage situations.the plot:the story is about Richard Wirth who a century ago does some wrong things to a family then in present time a captor visits his brother & seeks revenge on his captors they both go to the town unaware of the horror awaits them.i won't reveal the details of whats the connection between family & these 2 brothers & how they come on the same side to defeat the evil but like i said this project feels something is missing it tries is best and does a good job at keeping the viewer hooked but falls short on proper execution.now one may ask what is the point of this whole film why this lame story was written at all involving Hitler apart from fiction some people still believe he was into magic & nonsense i wont go in those matters period,all i know is Joel Schumacher made this only for getting kicks out of the characters on the screen to put it simply Michael Fassbender is the man that owns this film as Richar Wirth he overshadows everyone i mean i ignored the plot and what was going on i was just looking at him.Overall Town Creek aka Blood Creek 2009 should be liked for what it is it is passable as a cheesy horror suspense film with Rated R scenes my rating is 5/10.Recommended

sdngry The story is very weak. They tried to give the movie some background by throwing in Nazis and Hitler's ambition for immortality but to no avail. Take out the Nazi bit and its a horror cliché, with a sorcerer turning himself into monster to be immortal and has to consume blood to go on. Gee we haven't seen that one before!The zombies (vampires?) are not scary and the main guy is first a mummy then he becomes Hellraiser without the pins. The animal slaughter is not scary but simply repulsive.I've only given the movie 5 stars because Henry Cavill is super hot and gives us at least something to look at (yes I'm superficial so what?) and Michael Fassbender steals the movie in the short time he appears as human. Don't waste your time if you're not a Cavill fan like me.

oliverdelasti I don't know why I ever thought that a movie by Joel Schumacher would be worth watching. This guy is incapable of telling a story, instead he is more focused on creating dramatic lighting effects that look like a scene from an advert for the latest Volkswagen ad. He has the talent of Michael Fassbender at his disposal but reduces his appearance in the film to a few mumbled lines and appearing from every conceivable camera angle. After the black and white bit we jump to modern day America, no character development, plot explained in clumsy dialogue, something dramatic happens, then we see two dudes riding off down a river in a canoe, that's where I switched off. I'm never watching a movie by this buffoon again.

scottmannen1 One thing I have gotten quite tired of is generic zombie films. Let me be clear in stating this is not one of those. This movie starts out with some WW2 Nazi doctor experimenting with the occult, necromancy and Norse mythology all intertwined together. Needless to say it makes for a decent plot line.What I found separated this movie above standard zombie slasher fare was the story and mythos blended with a good amount of lore. The movie spans a time period of many decades and is easy to understand. It is scary at many times and will definitely get a few jumps out of you.Bottom line: this movie is above average for a B movie- in my opinion its definitely worth the watch. Dominic Purcell of Prison Break fame does a good acting job as usual and makes the movie work! Check it out!