Broken Arrow

1950 "The most powerful weapon is courage..."
7.1| 1h33m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 01 August 1950 Released
Producted By: 20th Century Fox
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Indian scout Tom Jeffords is sent out to stem the war between the Whites and Apaches in the late 1870s. He learns that the Indians kill only to protect themselves, or out of retaliation for white atrocities.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Starz

Director

Producted By

20th Century Fox

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Laikals The greatest movie ever made..!
Manthast Absolutely amazing
Lollivan It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.
Lidia Draper Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.
retroparat I saw this movie a few times back a while and then just watched it. First, James Stewart gets shot twice at point blank range and survives, and wants ro kill tbe people thay just shot him, joke as are most movies with violence. Second, Debra Paget was 15 years old at the start of filming. That is awfully young to be a romantic lead with a 41 year old Stewart . It, really shows how people, especially white people , their own people, that they should protect goes out their way for a cause that was achieved, or lack there of, 80 or so years early than this movie. But because people never give up on these so called causes that we have issue and problems. It was, as usual, a movie in the late 40s and through the 1950s that broached a so called cause. This cause, as I said earlier, was finished and done but they, the "Holywood" people want to use this not as a call to help the Red man but to try and parallel it, the Red man's cause, with the issues of the day, that day or days was the early 1950s. And it works because after reading a lot of reviews, from today's people, they are sympethic with the plight of a people, yet not being there and not having their whole super close family and friends wiped out. And those people, today, still talk about it and act like it is so difficult to make it in the U.S.A. today. Well, the movie, as usual, is a piece that wants to make a point, even at the expense of their own people. The issue is that the reviewers here, if in charge then, would have done the same thing , but sitting here and comfortable it is easy to pass judgment on those that were distraught and left alone in the middle of the southwest. If these reviewers were in charge of the country from the beginning there would not be a country and all of the people of the world that were being destroyed would not have a place to go for freedom. People that come to this country , like my grandparents were happy as h__l to be here and sent 4 boys to WW 2 because it was America and who cares if the enemy may be tour ancestors. They were called names by all sorts of the people in this country but knew they were the sacrifice for their children and grandchildren and so on to put a great foothold on America and not worry about where they came from but move forward and speak the dominant language instead of their own. But the reviewers are making this movie larger than it is. Because they think of others so they can get their pat on the back, but stick by your own through, not only the good but the not so good, but no matter the ill and the ill will be fixed id really, really, really wrong, then we will be one people, be one peoples and we will have a greater peace than ever before. Until then movies like these will always fuel the mind of the young to do things they normally would not do and it may have started with their parents who when they were young filled their minds. It's a nice little western, but when I watch movies it is so tiring to see what they do to a movie instead of making it entertaining. FORGET THE POINT JUST ENTERTAIN. Thanks God Bless James
weezeralfalfa According to this film, among the Apache, the breaking of an arrow in half was symbolic of a truce agreement. I understand this was actually a custom of the Blackfeet, not the Apache. The Chiricahua Apache, under Cochise and several other leaders, had been waging guerilla warfare against white intruders for at least a decade. The whites demanded protection from the military, who had been mostly ineffective, because of the rough terrain. A gold prospector and would-be peace emissary named Tom Jeffords(Jimmy Stewart) happened upon a wounded Apache boy and nursed him to health. This proved to be his ticket to talk to Cochise(Jeff Chandler) Initially, he finally extracted a promise not to bother the mail carriers who had to ride close to Apache territory. Later, he finally extracted a promise to consider a general truce, provided the terms met his approval. General O. Howard was sent by President Grant(this being 1872) to extract a peace treaty from Cochise. Jeffords guided him to meet with Cochise, and a treaty was signed, giving the Apache control of most of the SE corner area of Arizona territory. But soon some whites who really hated Apaches sprung an ambush on the little party of Cochise, Jeffords, and Jeffords' new wife: Sonseeahray(Morningstar)(Debra Paget). Cochise escaped, and later killed several of the ambushers, but Jeffords and Morningstar didn't find cover fast enough, Jeffords being knocked out by a bullet and left for dead, and Morningstar being killed. Later Jeffords 'wakes up', seemingly with no wound that would cause him to faint. Both Jeffords and Morningstar were crazy to fully expose themselves to multiple rifles, running toward the ambushers. Morningstar was brandishing a knife, so what did she expect?:A very awkward, if crucial, scene.This film is rather unusual for its times in several respects. Firstly, at a time when most westerns were still shot in B&W, it was shot in Technicolor, providing many colorful backdrops from various locations in AZ. Second, it tells the story more from the Native American perspective, as opposed to the usual European viewpoint, still rare, but not unique, at this time(Think "Fort Apache").Thirdly, most of the main characters are based on real people and how they actually interacted with each other. This included General Howard, as well as Jeffords and Cochise. However, Geronimo(Jay Silverheels),as the leader of the treaty-rejecting faction of Apache, didn't really fit into this historical context. Unfortunately, the treaty only lasted 4 years, before an incident caused the territorial whites to demand that the Apache be removed from their area and resettled in a reservation. During this time Jeffords was their government agent. Cochise lived only 2 of those years, dying of natural causes. Unfortunately, nearly all treaties between Native Americans and the US government were short-term expediencies, with the understanding by the US government that eventually all tribes would be confined to reservations, usually far from their traditional homeland, and where useful resources were few. General Howard was later assigned to try to keep the peace in eastern Oregon and Washington. The story of his interactions with Nez Perce Chief Joseph is told in the film "I Will Fight No More Forever": a famous quote from Joseph. Howard was the ideal military commander and treaty negotiator to sue for peace in both these instances. He was unusually tolerant of the Native American viewpoint. Incidentally, he was also a leader in promoting actual equal rights for African Americans, and was a cofounder of Howard University, in Washington, D.C.. If you look closely, you will notice that Howard is missing his right arm, which happened in one of the many Civil War battles he fought in. I found no record of the existence of Sonseeahray,thus assume she is probably fictional. I thought Debra played her a little too wooden and formal. Five years later she again played the lead Indian maiden, again with a rather wooden performance, in "White Feather", with a rather similar plot to the present film, but involving the Cheyenne. Some reviewers comment on the great age disparity between Debra and Stewart as bordering on pedophilia. Occasionally a producer wanted a very young actress to play the romantic lead with an aging male icon who was still very popular. As another example, back in 1941, 16 year old Joan Leslie played a romantic partner, in separate movies, for Gary Cooper and Humphry Bogart, both born at the turn of the century, thus 25 years older than Joan. The producers presumably assumed that very young actresses would be equated by audiences with naïve virginal maidens. In "White Feather", Debra was, more appropriately, only 3 years younger than her costar who, however, lacked Stewart's charisma.Debra and Jeff didn't really fool us as bona fide Apache. Just as whites sometimes were made up to resemble African Americans in musicals, usually the lead Indians in westerns in this era were played by whites, for whatever reason.I don't want to end without mentioning Will Geer, who played the main Apache-hating villain. Will had quite a diverse life, sometimes serving as a folk singer, live theatrical entertainer , political agitator, and botanist, in addition to film and TV assignments. Here, he's just the bad guy, who can't forgive the Apaches for their past transgressions. Will had a major role in another western released in 1950, also shot in Technicolor with spectacular AZ scenery in the background, also largely from the Native American point of view, but the screenwriter must have flunked US history(or hoped we did). It's called "Comanche Territory", and it's a lot more fun than this film or any other western I can think of. Available very cheaply as part of an 10 pack of westerns.
Jonathan Roberts 'Broken Arrow' was one of the first Westerns I ever watched. When I saw it, I didn't know who James Stewart was - and now he stands as one of my favourite actors. Every now and then I post a response to an IMDb thread asking readers which Westerns are their favourites, and 'Broken Arrow' sometimes makes an appearance in my list - a list which mostly consists of much bigger, more expensive and aspirational titles like 'The Searchers' and 'For a Few Dollars More'. What I like about Delmer Daves' comparatively modest Western is its spirit. 'Broken Arrow' appears to be a product of good intentions and intelligent reflection on the Western genre, especially concerning its generally unfavourable portrayal of Native Americans. 'Broken Arrow' wasn't the only Western to do this - 'Apache' did it, as did 'Fort Apache' towards the end. Delmer Daves' film delivers the message most effectively, though, and I attribute this in part to both the strong writing and the effective performances of James Stewart and Jeff Chandler. The Western has come a long way in its extensive history, and films like 'Broken Arrow' are of understated importance in shaping and improving it.
Robert W. I think you'd be hard pressed to find a film in the Western genre that has a significant moral and ethical message woven into its fabric. Broken Arrow is exactly that. It doesn't even try to hide the message, this film is as political as it could possibly be. There are some significant controversies around the film given many of the Native Americans were played by non-Native Americans but honestly...does that matter? This was during a time when Native Americans were not portrayed well and I happen to think they did them justice in a big way. The film does use many of the elements we know from Western films but it still has this distinctive style of its own because of this brilliant and beautiful story about friendship. From what I know of the late 1800's history this was very accurate to the stories and bravo to them for that. Its a simple story and the romance almost gets in the way but at the same time adds a lot of heart to the overall film and is necessary for entertainment value if nothing else. The performances for me were nothing short of amazing and there was just some incredible chemistry and a story that was fascinating. It is easily one of the most well written and intelligent Westerns I have ever seen.If you follow my reviews you'll know I am on a quest to gorge myself on Mr. Jimmy Stewart. The man is a truly Hollywood legend, generally considered one of the greatest actors of all time and I adore his Westerns (most of them.) In this film he is just on his A-Game. Stewart's Tom Jeffords is stoic, heroic, determined and tough as grit. This is about him being a cowboy and we know a little about Jeffords background. His diplomacy leads a nation to attempt peace with a people they took everything from. Stewart is just brilliant in this. Jeff Chandler plays the Apache leader Cochise and really steals the show in my opinion. He was amazing. Yes, I know he's not Native American but did he not do the role justice? He is just shows so much depth and charisma and leadership and the chemistry between his Cochise and Jeffords is remarkable. I would kill to see the TV Series that ran two seasons (neither man reprise their role) but this relationship is the ultimate friendship out of the ashes. Debra Paget (she was 15 at the time, something that I could just barely get past because it seems awkward with Stewart's age of 41) is the lovely and innocent Sonseeahray who steals Jeffords' heart. She really does steal it because the two go from seeing each other once to a passionate love affair. I understand the relationship and how vital it was and they were very good together but it is rushed and feels almost unnecessary. They spend time building a romance that is constantly rushed from start to finish.The romantic side of things and the far too brief, cut and dry ending are my only complaints about this amazing classic film. The story is just brilliant and it is steeped in history and in a genre that is crowded with thousands of films this one stands apart. Hollywood used to allow directors that knew their genre do their best work. Delmer Dawes has a handful of Western's to his credit. He went on to direct the classic 3:10 to Yuma (I have yet to see the original) and he knows the genre well. This is so much more than a Western. This isn't cowboys and Indians and its not dusty towns or gold mines or Civil War era. This is a story about the most amazing diplomatic mission. You will root for peace and cringe at the war and violence. If you are a lover of historical films or Westerns you will find this sits so high above everything else out there. It truly was a near perfect experience for me and I will absolutely be added it to my collection to see again. Broken Arrow is a classic in every sense of the word. 9/10