CommentsXp Best movie ever!

Ava-Grace Willis Story: It's very simple but honestly that is fine.

Stephanie There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

Dana An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

sophalla As far as it goes, the pilot episode really only seemed to have skimmed over elements of the books. It felt as if they picked things out, like time machines, the names, a mystery about cats, and Dirk's refrigerator argument.The major problem for this series is that it shouldn't relate to Dirk Gently at all. Though Adams was a big proponent of his work (book, TV, radio) never being the same, there were always elements connected them. Even if characters were portrayed differently by looks alone, they always had something connecting them back to the original incarnation.Dirk Gently doesn't do that, with exception to the title character. Gordon Way (though minor in appearance) is no longer the owner of successful WayForward, and he isn't the brother of Susan Way (who ceased to exist). He's a heartbroken rich man with a time machine who is trying to get back to Susan but ultimately fails. Nothing about the original Gordon remains except his name, status of wealth, and that he works with computers (except he was described in TV as "obsessed with," and that ultimately was MacDuff's personality in the book).Richard MacDuff is a polar opposite to himself. In the book, he's forgetful and slightly absentminded, haphazard, and more cautious toward Dirk. He's employed by Gordon. When he phones Susan, he makes apologies to and plans with her answering machine. Later, he breaks in and steals the tape. Not so for the show! MacDuff comes off as impulsively rude and a bit stupid. The best example for that is the very beginning. He's caught by Dirk burgling his own home to steal his girlfriend's laptop because he wants to break into her email to delete a scathing break-up message. Also, he's unemployed.Susan takes on an entirely new character and nothing except her first name and relationship to MacDuff is recognisable. Literally everything is different, including her last name and occupation.That is the main problem. There is nothing recognisable, nothing left of Adams' characters. For that, I give it an exceptionally low score.HOWEVER, had they renamed everyone and made it truly "inspired by" the book by taking the concept rather than butchering the characters completely, it would have been a wonderful stand alone. Another idea would be that they should have left out the stories entirely of everyone who wasn't Dirk and made an entirely new idea. There were so many avenues they could've taken, and they took the one that was easiest rather than exceptional.

Twone I really did want to enjoy this but it failed badly for me. I had just read the original Dirk Gently book on which this is based. The plot itself bares not much resemblance to the book but it does just enough to make you remember the original book. Gone are the electronic monk and Professor Chronotis along with the ghost of Gordon Way and the fact that Richard McDuff was employed by Gordon along with Susan being his sister and not his ex-love as she was in this version. In their defence the makers of this television version were always going to struggle to fit the plot of the book into a one hour show.It reminded me of the new BBC version of Sherlock written by Stephen Moffat & Mark Gatiss. Sadly, this version of Dirk Gently can not hold a torch to the fore mentioned programme. In the lead, Stephen Mangan felt like he was over doing the eccentricity of Adams's creation and Darren Boyd as McDuff didn't bring anything to his character.And can you believe that an iPhone would be able to hold its charge for sixteen years? I think not.If the BBC decided to commission this pilot for a series then I hope that they only use the characters and no more Adams's plots or stories as it will only draw comparison to the originals.I, for one, won't bother with the series if by some clerical error it ever sees the light of day.

adrian_j_beaumont I've been a long time fan of all things Adamsy, slightly disappointed with the movie version of HGTTG, somehow i expected it to be better than the TV series in relation to the extra amount spent, so i was wondering what they'd done with this.I already knew this was going to follow the characters but not the actual story line of the book.In the end i thought they pulled it off pretty well. Mangan is well cast as Dirk, it's all rather quirky, Dirk comes across as a total charlatan just as i imagined him from the books.I wonder if they'll make a series? I hope so. Keep it short so you don't run out of ideas and lets hope they make a better job of trying to recreate Douglas sense of humour than Eoin Colfer did with 'And Another Thing'

pixel80 If I wasn't so familiar with the superb Dirk Gently audiobooks, this would have been so much more enjoyable. As it was, each time I managed to suspend my memories and enjoy the production for what it was (Stephen Mangan and Darren Boyd are excellent and make it eminently watchable) I was brought up short by another monstrous deviation from the original. I can accept that condensing an entire novel into an hour of television will mean drastic cuts and consequent streamlining - what I cannot understand or accept is basic plot, relationship and character re-working. For example in the original, MacDuff is a brilliant software designer, employed and exploited by Gordon Way, and MacDuff's girlfriend Susan is Way's sister - not an old flame with whom he is still obsessed. (It's interesting to see in the IMDb cast list for the show that Helen Baxendale is billed as playing Susan WAY (as per the book) not Susan HARMISON (as per the TV production). I found it irritating to notice casual references to the original: e.g. on Gently's blackboard is scrawled "Electronic Monk" (blink and you'd miss it) - a key character in the original. Perhaps these incidentals were intended by the writer as a nod of recognition to Adams, but they struck me more as a jibe, suggesting "I've got your works and I'm taking over - and there's nothing you can do about it". I certainly did feel that Howard Overman, credited as the "writer and creator" paid scant regard to Adams's work other than to make use of his characters and concepts. I can't help wondering if, had the Dirk Gently name and associations not been used, but instead it had been a script about an unconventional private detective, whether it would not have been better? It was after all only very loosely based on the book, almost unrecognisably so and with plenty of new material introduced. But perhaps the Dirk Gently element is relatively irrelevant - perhaps the essential crowd-puller is the Douglas Adams name. Stephen Mangan's portrayal of Gently was pretty convincing - without that I think it would have had far less in common with Adams's books. And Darren Boyd has that rare gift of seeming to play a part simply as himself, never varying - yet becoming totally believable as that character.There was one continuity blip that delighted me - about halfway through, Gently and MacDuff are seated at a table in the pub. Gently sips his pint, putting it down about 3/4 full, then knocks back a chaser, stands up and leaves. MacDuff is drinking his own pint, the barman comes over to ask for payment and Gently's glass is magically empty. Perhaps it's the interconnectedness of Gently to his beer at work ....I do hope there will be a series - but even more I hope that Adams's stories will be used, not just the names and a couple of plot elements.