Supelice Dreadfully Boring

SpunkySelfTwitter It’s an especially fun movie from a director and cast who are clearly having a good time allowing themselves to let loose.

Quiet Muffin This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.

Paynbob It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.

caseynicholson I've given this film 5/10 stars mostly due to the fact that it's extremely well made. The script, so far as the storytelling, the film's pacing etc, is quite good, as are the acting and cinematography. All in all it was a well made, well produced movie. For that reason, I've rated this movie higher than I might otherwise.However, the film is deeply problematic when it comes to its message.First, I'll reiterate what other user reviews have stated: This film is a "Crash" clone. It is a complicated story in which the lives of twelve different people are all intertwined, such that several different personal stories all wind up overlapping. Indeed, it is such an obvious ripoff of "Crash" that the movie almost constitutes plagiarism in some regards.But if you can get past that, the bigger problem with this movie is its convoluted message. The film begins with a quote from the Book of James, "Faith Without Acts is Dead". If you go and read that passage in context, you'll find that James is exhorting the faith community to do good works for the community--to care for widows and orphans, so the passage reads.As such, one might guess that surely this movie's intention is to follow in the spirit of that message. But that's not so. While the film does have a few things that can be interpreted as promoting the importance of good deeds, the more overt message seems to be that faith in action is a faith which professes itself, and one which acts by making others believe the same things you do. That's a very different message than the one that the initial quote from James is meant to convey.Early in the film a pastor at a local church is approached by a street preacher who asks him if he "believes in the cross of Christ." A short conversation ensues in which the street preacher says that to some the cross stands for forgiveness and redemption, but then asks him what does it really mean? He then states that the cross, "loves, and forgives, and demands.....demands that we profess it." The pastor then goes back and shares this message with his congregation. And so, the strong suggestion here is that faith in action is a faith that shares itself with others--one that evangelizes, and one that professes itself rather than keeping to itself.Again, this is a very different conception of faith in action than the passage that appears on screen at the beginning of the film. The movie seems to reduce James's message to sharing one's beliefs with others. That's convoluted at best--and arguably constitutes poor theology.But there are other problems.As the film progresses we meet Joe Phillips, a reformed felon who has gotten his life back on track, but who is now dying of leukemia. Near the film's end Joe passes away in a hospital bed, is dead for eight minutes, and then miraculously comes back to life and is fully healed. Through this miracle, several people come to believe in the power of God. The scene that plays out on screen is not a scene in which someone dies from an accident of some sort or a heart attack--something in which one might plausibly somehow be resuscitated, or in which doctors are working to save a man who slips away but is then brought back to life. Rather, this man is dying of a chronic disease which he has been suffering from the complications of for many months, then does in fact die, and then is miraculously healed.As a minister, I believe in miracles. But I also know that this is not how God works for folks facing end of life issues with chronic diseases. That being the case, I found this part of the film to be deeply troublesome. This movie communicates a false sense of hope to its audience, and one that bears some resemblance to the "prosperity gospel" which is so common in contemporary American culture. The message goes that if you simply believe in the power of God, God will bless you in extraordinary ways--in this case through the gift of a miraculous healing.At the end of the movie there is a strong suggestion that the intricate web of stories that the twelve-person plot has offered leads to the conclusion that "everything happens for a reason", another problematic concept inasmuch as it doesn't allow for a proper theology of sin. To suggest that everything that happens in the course of history happens for a reason is to suggest that God wills sin. The movie counters this concept elsewhere (Majors lecture to Shepherd about God's presence in the event of their daughter's death), which makes it unfortunate that it ends with a nod to this very problematic idea of determinism.Finally, one of the major points of the story revolves around a firefighter who takes a stand for his faith despite being pressured by his job. He shares his faith with a man who is on his deathbed and is then sued for doing so. The film seems to celebrate this type of evangelism—deathbed confessions, and inasmuch reduces "believing" to a type of altar call experience. The firefighter's unfolding pride of this evangelism is likewise celebrated in a way that was troublesome.That said, my big problem with this movie is that its message comes across as a hodgepodge of smaller messages, and inasmuch as that's true it's hard to really understand what the takeaway of the film is really intended to be. In attempting to put forth several ideas in one film, what we end up with is a movie that says nothing at all very well, and makes you think very hard to understand what it was trying to say. It may suit you fine for entertainment purposes, but don't expect much in the way of a good takeaway.

brycebachelder-71389 I'm in ministry, and I'm all about using art to share the gospel... but this movie is just not good. The writing's bad, the acting is stiff, and the concept is pretty much a less interesting Christian version of "Crash". It also played into some racially insensitive stereotypes: the criminals were all black, the black mother gave threats of "whoopins", the unmarried pregnant girl was Latina, and all the good guys were white. I'll give the benefit of the doubt and say these things were unintentional by the writers, but the racial undertones were still obvious to those paying attention. It seems the message of the movie is trying to reach non-Christians, but it's so full of "Christianese" language and phrases that the only people who will have any idea what the heck they're talking about are those who already believe. I'm not against using film and all art forms to proclaim Jesus, but I am against doing it badly. Christians need to be creative and original, and not just emulate (poorly) what is being done in the "secular" movie and music industries. If we are to hold ourselves to higher standards throughout life, let's hold ourselves to higher standards when it comes to making art as well.

poorboy671 There are so many excellent reviews of this movie already, so there is no need for me to write what has already been written. I just wanted to tell everyone that no matter what the IMDb vote count says, it does not reflect how great this movie is...it doesn't begin to do this movie justice. I understand that there are a lot of non-believers or people who simply refuse to believe. But for those who are searching for answers...who are looking for direction and something that's worth believing in, then this movie will bless you tremendously. There are a lot of faith-based movies that at best...are mediocre. But this is not one of them. This is one of the most heartfelt and touching movies I've yet to see...and I've seen a lot of movies. If you don't feel your eyes welling up...even to the point of sobbing...then you have to be a cold hearted individual. And I pray that God will change your heart. I recommend this movie for everyone...at least give it the benefit of the doubt and watch it...all the way to the end. It was a great blessing to me, and I hope it will be to all who watch this movie as well.

jmbellmyer First of all, don't get me wrong. God's Not Dead was a very good movie and I plan to see the sequel. However I stumbled upon Do You Believe and this movie was a couple of steps higher in my opinion. Seeing a pastor struggle with his own faith, seeing how Christians can and should care for each other and for the world, seeing people discover faith, or rediscover gave me hope. God's Not Dead was like an appetizer or conversation starter. Do You Believe is the main course, with more structure, more believable characters. Mira Sorvino's single mother character is compelling. Sean Astin --who plays an evangelist in Woodlawn -- is a callous jerk of a doctor in this movie. And I loved seeing Cybil Shepherd and Lee Majors back on the screen. I liked this movie so much I offered to lead a bible study at my church around it. I have the curriculum. We'll start after Christmas. Join me