GarnettTeenage The film was still a fun one that will make you laugh and have you leaving the theater feeling like you just stole something valuable and got away with it.

Hayleigh Joseph This is ultimately a movie about the very bad things that can happen when we don't address our unease, when we just try to brush it off, whether that's to fit in or to preserve our self-image.

Bob This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

Cassandra Story: It's very simple but honestly that is fine.

Michael_Elliott Duck Pimples (1945) *** (out of 4)Donald is listening to scary radio broadcasts, which soon has his mind working in overdrive as he finds himself terrified of everything that moves.DUCK PIMPLES isn't your typical Disney short because it seems like something that would have been made twenty years later by someone on an acid trip. If you watch enough movies then I'm sure you've came across that shorts from the 60s where people trip and before long they're seeing all sorts of bizarre images. That's basically what we've got here because Donald's imagination starts going nuts and he sees a rather weird subplot dealing with stolen jewels. The entire short just has a bizarre feel to it so it really stands out in regards to Disney and the type of shorts they were making during this period.

OllieSuave-007 In this Disney cartoon, Donald reads a mystery book sold to him by an oddball salesman and becomes so involved in that his imagination makes it appear the characters are coming to life, making Donald the center of the mystery caper. What results is this detective-like but unexciting whodunit mystery that features these random characters, including one that resembles Jessica Rabbit.This is not the conventional humorous, action-flicked and bad luck-plaque Donald Duck cartoon. I didn't get a whole lot of laughs from this one. The attempt at the mystery setting is clever and the animation is great, but the overall story itself is pretty boring, unfortunately.Grade D-

MartinHafer This is one of the weirdest and most surreal shorts I have ever seen and it's really a surprise that it came from Disney. Unlike a typical Donal Duck film, this one has a bizarre stream of consciousness that defies my ability to explain it in mere words. Believe me...it's really weird--like the Disney staff decided to try making a short after taking some LSD or something! Donald is at home reading and listening to the radio. The stuff he's being bombarded with is pretty scary and suddenly the radio show and book start coming to life! Characters from a murder mystery come jumping out of his book and the radio provides lots of appropriate creepy music. It's crazy--and well worth seeing just because it is so atypical. About the only Donald film I've ever seen that comes close to this one in weirdness is "Der Fuehrer's Face". Yes, it's that weird--with very elastic characters, a pre-Jessica Rabbit sort of hot dame and a style that just seems so un-Disney. Well worth seeing.

F Gwynplaine MacIntyre Virgil Partch, who signed his name 'ViP', was a magazine and newspaper cartoonist noted for his clean uncluttered linework and weirdly surrealistic humour. Although ViP was definitely an original, his subject matter is similar to that of Gahan Wilson, Arnold Roth and the great Basil Wolverton. The very first issue of Playboy magazine had two illustrations on its cover: a photo of Marilyn Monroe, and a drawing by ViP, with a caption stating that more ViP cartoons were inside. If it's good enough for Playboy, it's good enough for me.Oddly, the short Disney cartoon 'Duck Pimples' seems to be Virgil Partch's one and only foray into film animation ... odd, because it's a complete success which should have brought Partch similar job assignments. The credits of 'Duck Pimples' list Partch only as scriptwriter, but the characters in this cartoon (except for Donald Duck) show the clear influence of Partch's linework, and they don't resemble other Disney characters from this period. I'm positive that Partch must have drawn the model sheets for these characters, and he may well have drawn key poses for the characters as well. This is a fun cartoon that the whole family will enjoy: it has Disney's high production values, yet (despite the presence of Donald Duck) it isn't a typical Disney cartoon.The title 'Duck Pimples' is awkward: the opening title card bears the title 'Goose Pimples', with 'Goose' crossed out and 'Duck' written underneath. Either way, the title doesn't make much sense, because this cartoon doesn't have a scary theme. At the beginning, Donald Duck is alone in his house on a dark night, reading a spooky story. There's one very clever visual device, as Donald's armchair gradually morphs into a green monster underneath his body. Even small children will recognise that this is a symptom of Donald's imagination, not an actual event. But after this clever image, the cartoon veers away from scary themes into the wild surrealism typical of Partch's magazine cartoons. Even the story in Donald's book moves away from scary themes into whodunnit territory.The characters in Donald's story leap out of the book and start haranguing him. Among these is a police detective with an Irish brogue, his voice supplied (uncredited) by silent-film comedian and longtime voice artist Billy Bletcher. Also present is Pauline, a sexy female cartoon character who seems to be a prototype for Jessica Rabbit.The action is weird and fast-paced, more typical of Bob Clampett at Warners during this same period than anything Disney was doing at this time. But the violence in 'Duck Pimples' is negligible (which was seldom true of Clampett), and the whole film is delightful except for a very weak final gag. I'll rate 'Duck Pimples' 9 out of 10.