SnoReptilePlenty Memorable, crazy movie

Majorthebys Charming and brutal

Juana what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

Aspen Orson There is definitely an excellent idea hidden in the background of the film. Unfortunately, it's difficult to find it.

christopher-underwood Not as enjoyable as the earlier, Freeway and though more gruelling, probably not as well made. The picture on the DVD sleeve of a row of girls knelt before toilets ready to be sick, did not encourage me to rush to watch this and despite going for even more grossness, or maybe because of that, director Bright looses some of the tightness of the other film. Natasha Lyonne and Maria Celedonio both work overtime to convey the horror of their characters but there is much more of the cartoon here and by the time we reach the rather drawn out end with Vincent Gallo camping it up, the tale has ground to a grubby halt and we no longer know whether to laugh or cry. Watch Freeway first and if you don't like, steer well clear of this but if you find the first film not as strong as you were expecting, then by all means give this one a ride.

The_Void First of all, I have to say that this really isn't a sequel to 1996's Freeway; it features the same director and the plot is again loosely based on a fairy tale; but the similarities end there and I can only imagine the film has 'Freeway 2' in it's title so they didn't have to release it as just 'Confessions of a Trickbaby' (which is unlikely to appeal to anyone). It would appear that the film's only intention is to be as depraved and vulgar as possible. I actually have no problem with this in theory; but unfortunately the film itself is not interesting enough to justify it. The film begins with a sequel that shows young hell raising bulimia-sufferer Crystal (better known as 'White Girl') given twenty five years for a series of minor crimes. She is sent to a women's prison, while her lawyer tries to get her off. While inside, she meets Cyclona; a Mexican murderess; and after a bunch of scenes showing girls being sick and stuff, the pair eventually escapes and goes on the run while trying to make it to Mexico.The film is supposedly a variant on the classic fairy tale 'Hansel and Gretel' but I don't know why this was included in the film. There are a couple of nods to it; but mostly they're very lame (not to mention loose) and the film would have been better off just forgetting about this part of the plot. Natasha Lyonne takes the lead role and actually does a fairly good job. Her character made me roll my eyes a few times; but she is at least memorable. She gets support from María Celedonio, who is good enough; while David Alan Grier steals the show as the amusing offbeat lawyer. The film tries its best to be cool throughout; but unfortunately never really achieves it as it tries too hard. I was really starting to get bored as the ending loomed in sight; the first hour or so is mindlessly entertaining, but then the film tries to get a bit clever and I didn't care for it. On the face of it, this sounds like a film that will appeal to fans of wayward cinema; but it's just not very well done and I'd recommend French film Criminal Lovers instead if you want a contemporary thriller based on Hansel and Gretel.

bob the moo Unfairly sentenced to 25 years for stealing and selling cocaine, Crystal (aka Whitegirl) is sent to a young offenders prison for girls before starting her sentence. She shares a cell with serial killer lesbian Cyclona who plans an escape. The pair break out and go on a cross country run - leaving a trail of bodies behind them. Eventually they find apparent safety in the arms of Sister Gomez in Mexico.I was taken in by the title - it did not have the `Freeway 2' bit in the title when I saw it advertised. Other reviewers have called it weird and trippy and in that regard they are right. However to try and say that this is an enjoyable film simply because it is different is a bit too much for me. While this film may have the odd quality that is of value it has vastly more that is repugnant, puerile or just plain stupid. I'll admit that it is imaginative - but not necessarily in a good way - and that it is certainly different from other films you tend to see in your cinema (especially in this summer blockbuster season) but neither of these means it is a good film. It has moments that are passable and the actual core plot is OK (baring in mind that the core plot, when you strip it down, is Hansel & Gretel) but it is full of such ill-judged touches that all I remember is the bad stuff.The film's tone is bad from the start - vomiting is watched with the sort of eye that feels like it is making something deliberately shocking - like a teenager trying to gross out his parents to get attention. A scene where girls pass a bucket around and vomit in it goes nowhere and seems only to exist for shock value. That the film continues with gory murders for no reason and intertwined sexual imagery just adds to the feeling of a director playing at being `dangerous and daring'. When Cyclona sits over two OAPs she has just butchered and masturbates with an handheld vibrator you know that this is not a film that wants to aspire beyond the gutter.In fact the whole lesbian thing is played for shock and to attract late night TV surfers. The lesbian stuff is all mouth - teasing the audience. However those hoping for some depth in the relationship will be let down - as will those looking for a helping hand to fill those lonely nights, as the love scene is awful. Worse than this is the fact that the film has the repeated suggestion that `alternative sexuality's' are not normal but are caused by extreme situations. This suggestion is offensive - and I'm not reading too much into it. Cyclona equates her love of sex with murder and suffering, she is clearly abnormal and her sexuality is a major way that the film portrays her in this way. Later we find out that the reason she likes girls is simply because she was abused by men in her past - other girls in the prison have similar pasts. This may be the case sometimes but in this film it is the ONLY reason. Crystal makes this even worse by relating to Cyclona by saying she only dates black men because white men abused her - again relating anything that is not `the norm' to abuse as a causation factor.Now at one point the film is moving as Cyclona discovers the degree of her abuse. That moved me. And to be fair the film could have been making a serious point by looking at abuse - but this is not that type of film and the crude brushstrokes that paint the characters (alternate sexuality's stem only from cases of abuse??) are dumb and insulting. Add this to the unrelenting flow of foul language, needlessly voyeuristic sex and violence and you have a real dog of a film. It all feels like the director was trying to be so different that he forgot to make structure or even a good film - he too seems to be under the illusion that a `different' film will sell simply because it is weird or different.The casting continues this trend. Gallo is a total joke - a cross dressing nun-come-witch who speaks in a joke sing-song voice. His cross dressing bares no relevance to the film and again just seems like another ploy to make the film `different'. Lyonne is not very good in the lead - she rarely has any character to speak of and always has an attitude on her that makes it feel like she's only seconds away from saying `whateva'. María Celedonio is really good and is better than the film deserves - she is the sole reason for staying with the film. I admit that I'm biased as I was a little attracted to her looks (tattoos looked good on her thin arms) but she actually manages a good performance out of a shallow character. She brings emotion to the role in a way that is believable and is out of place here. Grier as Crystal's lawyer is funny but again his character is in it for shock value and to make the film `different' - the scene where he sits in a courthouse discussing a plea while his client furiously masturbates him is the height of the humour in the film.Overall this has `cult appeal' written all over it and I think the director wanted that from the outset. I'm sure this will have tonnes of students loving it talking about how it is so dark, weird and different. However it really isn't any good. The film tires so hard to be `different' that it adds things all the time - but the end result is that it feels forced and trashy. I know other reviewers will hate on me for this review because it is one of my stronger ones - but honestly this film sets out to repel, why would I chose to ever watch this again?

saragrace17 So this movie was not very normal... who cares I really liked it. In a sick and twisted way it gives a cool notion of girl power and overcoming all of the screwed up aspects of your childhood. I think that is also says something very interesting about how times have changed...I mean if this is the modern day Hansel and Gretel then think about our world. There is a lot of shock value and dark humor but Natasha Lyonne is waaaayyy cool in this part as white girl. See it if only to note how time and materials for literature have changed.