Alicia I love this movie so much

Zandra The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

Guillelmina The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

Roxie The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;

diana-94544 I am be a little prejudiced, but my son Hunter Fischer is the main little boy in the movie. We have worked with Trace, Kris, Bruce and Kai in a few movies love them all. We grew to love Luke Hemsworth he is an amazing person. We love love the whole cast a crew. They are an amazing group of people.

mcimadevil Hemsworth was awful. Can't act and didn't even look like the pictures of Wild Bill. I lost interest in this film in the beginning but continued to watch to see if it got better. It didn't.

omendata Sadly the western is no more if the last few efforts are to be judged by.This film conclusively proves that none of the Hemsworth clan can act. It also proves that you don't really need acting talent to get into the movies these days, just a pretty boy face, six pack and some muscles, a relative in the industry or doing a Harvie Weinstein manoeuvre!Boring formulaic story that's been done to death. Main character who couldn't act his way out of a paper bag. No persona , no true grit , no tough cowboy just another Hemsworth pretty boy in a hat. The bad guy who was as mean and scary as Pee Wee Herman.The days of the good ole cowboy movie seem to be over - No more Magnificent Seven, no more Pale Riders just pretty boys who give nothing to the genre - It seems the last of the great real cowboys was indeed Clint Eastwood as none have matched his performance in any way.From the awful Colin Farrell in the dire remake of THE BEGUILED to the tragic remake of one of the best western ever THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN - It seems even a remake of the WILD BUNCH is in the offing - Oh dear is all I can say even old old movies like SHADOW OF CHIKARA beat this dull attempt at a Wild Bill Hickock story line.This is like a mid week afternoon made for TV movie - they might as well have chucked in Fernando Lamas and Jane Seymour!

Ray3100 The movie starts with the Confederate army using a gatling gun and goes downhill from there. A few union commanders used their own money to purchase 12 of these guns. The US Army didn't officially buy any until 1866. The Confederates never had any. Then there's the problem with John Wesley Hardin. First of all, his alias was Wesley Clemmons, but the movie implies it was the other way around. And second, Hardin was never Hickok's deputy. Finally, the climatic battle between the villain and the hero. It happened on the street not in the saloon and only Poe was killed, except for a real deputy that Hickok shot on accident. I usually try to give Hollywood some leeway when it comes to historical accuracy, but this is just too much.