Smartorhypo Highly Overrated But Still Good

Aneesa Wardle The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

Married Baby Just intense enough to provide a much-needed diversion, just lightweight enough to make you forget about it soon after it’s over. It’s not exactly “good,” per se, but it does what it sets out to do in terms of putting us on edge, which makes it … successful?

Wyatt There's no way I can possibly love it entirely but I just think its ridiculously bad, but enjoyable at the same time.

divg-57-800054 I saw on tv. Maybe the history is not the most original, but has some moments and a mix of interesting elements. It's not a movie for a 4/10 maybe near a 6 for normal people, 7 for teenagers and a 5 - 5.5 for sci-fi fans.

alanpgini Great idea, great premise good progression on a tech Sci Fi theory that is looking more and more plausible every day. It holds your attention, then it ends......badly. Why go through with the whole story progression when the end doesn't justify, well, the means? What was the conclusion? The answer was that there wasn't any. If you like tech for its own sake, and a story that forgets to end itself, then this is for you. The only conclusion I can draw here, is that they are making a sequel or a series. But rest assured, this audience member won't bight on watching the sequel. What is it with these low budget producers and their reach that exceeds a grasp ego thats a million light years away from reality? Great acting from Gabriel Byrne and the others was wasted on this thing.

Malgga Before watching this film, I thought it would be an intelligent, thought-provoking sci-fi thriller, but then after wasting one and half an hour on it, I couldn't be disappointed more. As a reviewer before me pointed out, this movie is about three young scientists, who try to develop a software capable of uploading one's memories, but we see no new technology here. Instead these people are either almost constantly on different drugs or remembering when they were on drugs. How these junkies can be scientists is beyond me, when they are not capable of thinking clearly. Concerning the production values, this film is very cheap. The photography is amateurish (as if high-school students made it) and the sound so bad one can hardly understand the actors. The acting is wooden, with the exception of the performance of Nora Arnezeder (she plays "Z"), who is a very talented actress and tries her best in this drivel, but really deserves to act in better things in the future. In short: This flick is how a high-school student imagines an "innovative" a sci-fi thriller. Please, don't waste your time on it.

Harrison Tweed (Top Dawg) A typical C-grade amateur production with cheap props and a story told over many times. This is very low budget. Acting, directing and writing is very novice.