Perry Kate Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Huievest Instead, you get a movie that's enjoyable enough, but leaves you feeling like it could have been much, much more.

StyleSk8r At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

Tobias Burrows It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

headshotofficial A rediculously slow and boring script, poor visual effects and editing, undeveloped characters with no meaning, long and meaningless scenes building the madness in ones mind, so long that I almost fell asleep in one of them and last but least... TERRIBLE acting! OVERALL : LAUGHABLE! The previous reviews got me thinking, 'It can't be that good' AND I WAS RIGHT! Almost two hours of my life totally wasted... Wish I had visited pornhub instead.

Pat Berg I'm not sure why people give plot details in reviews. But whatever. It did not look like it would live up to the creepy vibe in trailer and took time to get there, and was worth the build up. I think most people who like horror movies watch a lot of them (I do) so you can usually see what's coming. And this did not. Slow beginning, solid story, excellent conclusion. If a movie is not a slasher the story has to be good and this was excellent well crafted story. This is not boobs and blood teen horror, if you enjoy a good story you will enjoy.

alegault I never "review" movies, but when horror breaks what I consider to be the #1 cardinal rule of the genre, it makes me almost angry for some reason. That rule, which is an entirely personal one, is that if you're going to take yourself dead seriously with your horror movie, you damn well better have good acting. Your story has to embrace camp in order for bad acting to have any hope of working. The lead actors ability is to me only a few small steps above infomercial quality. There is no feeling to his performance here whatsoever, especially when it calls for dire emotion which it does much too often. The story's execution, although interesting on paper, really doesn't do him or the lead actress any favours. I couldn't in good conscience rate it as low as possible because there are three things, a star for each, that to me must be commended: 1) The location and cinematography that takes place outdoors is fantastic. Beautiful stuff. 2) The lead actress is absolutely gorgeous here, and her performance singlehandedly carried me through to the end, which I could barely believe I made it to. She is embarrassingly cheesy in the third act, which I won't spoil here, but that is entirely the fault of the filmmakers. She did what she could with what she was given. 3) The movie is dedicated to Christopher Lee. This one is self explanatory. 3/10

Ezequiel Rajoy I prepared my self with great expectations to enjoy this one. An allegedly "lovecraftian", slow burning creepy, Gothic horror movie? That sounds great! So the first and evident thing is this was done on a low budget; I'm OK with that, I prioritize a good script, directing skills, photography and dialogs over cgi and expensive technology. 20 min later I'm twisting in pain, and not in a good way (if there's such thing). This movie is actually painful to watch. The dialogs, the acting, the character interaction, makeup, directing, editing, set decoration. it's all so terribly bad that I couldn't even finish watching this aberration. There were two or three moments where illumination and photography looked pretty well (mostly scenery, and nature textures) thats why I scored a 2 and not just 1. I'm sure Lawrie Brewster will improve overtime and maybe become a great director, but right now it seems unfair to give this one a 10 star rating when it clearly doesn't deserves it