Inclubabu
Plot so thin, it passes unnoticed.
Maidexpl
Entertaining from beginning to end, it maintains the spirit of the franchise while establishing it's own seal with a fun cast
Hadrina
The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful
Neive Bellamy
Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.
Hollywood_Yoda
In this sequel to the very successful direct to video release of Mickeys Once Upon a Christmas, we see the group in 3D. Probably not the best way to transition the characters we are all use to seeing in hand drawn 2D animation to this monstrosity of Mickeys Twice Upon a Christmas! The only positive thing I can say about this title is that it is a Disney film, and that is not saying much! To say that this film is a waste of good stories is an understatement, just that in 3D, it seems unlike a Disney film! Still, however, this is a fairly nice Christmas video for the kids, don't get me wrong, they will most likely enjoy it! On the other hand, those of you who are used to seeing the Disney pack in their natural 2D, it is a disappointment. All I can say is to watch the video with an open mind, 6/10.
Elswet
What has become of the grandeur of Disney?! This is the worst CGI muck I've seen since the Hulk! I can't imagine what the Disney Corporation was thinking in approving this disgusting display of amateurish CGI animation, except to make a buck. And yet, they went on and released it?! I'm virtually in shock that this movie has received a 7.1 (for now) rating here at IMDb, making it the most over-rated piece of detritus in the Disney vaults. I must say it is THE single worst Disney presentation I've ever seen. I'd come to expect bad animation and horribly neglectful illustrations from Disney sequels, but this was no sequel; it was a feature film!We saw what could be done through CGI with Monsters, Inc., A Bug's Life, Finding Nemo, etc. This is more the quality I would have expected at the very beginning of the CGI age, not presently. I was very disappointed with this attempt, and would admonish Disney to do better next time!It rates a 1.3/10 from...the Fiend :.
Paul Turk
Some complaints have been made about the computer animation, but at least these are new shorts and not just old ones thrown together with a thin story line. I liked seeing these characters animated this way. Not that this computer animation is better (or even as good) than the traditional, but having never seen these classic characters like this was interesting. The overall content is very good. The weakest story is the first one with Minnie and Daisy. The best one, by far, is the last: MICKEY'S DOGGONE Christmas. This short in itself is worth the price of the DVD. Santa's reindeer Donner steals the show in this fast, fun and very funny short.
imdbrwd
I know the 3-D/CGI worshippers will dislike my heresy, but if ever there was a place NOT to use CGI, this is it. Most of these characters have been around for almost 75 years in their hand-drawn form, and that's what made them special. There was no need to re-make our favorites into what looks like plastic McDonald's toys, and these should be stuffed back into the bag (Santa's?). I'm glad I finally found a place to rent a copy rather than buying one, and it's obvious that the rental houses agree with my assessment, as I had to check on Netflix, two Blockbusters, and one Hollywood video before I could find a lone copy at a third Blockbuster. Please Disney, don't fix what ain't broke.