CheerupSilver Very Cool!!!

Tacticalin An absolute waste of money

Lollivan It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

Marva-nova Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

paul-ayres-60784 If you don't try to look for logic or a fluid storyline this movie is very enjoyable. It doesn't really have a plot, a beginning or even an ending but that's partly why I enjoyed it. I've read reviews that criticise the acting but I don't agree. It is very stylized and the comic acting is intentional. It's not pretending to reflect real life situations or characters. Yes, there is plenty of nudity but I thought it was done very sexily without being pornographic. To me this film has the potential to become a cult classic. It wouldn't make good reading but visually it is a lot of fun. If you are looking for a good story or a mystery then don't bother. If you just want comic book style entertainment this movie hits the spot.

BA_Harrison A group of friends—Noah (Bryce Draper), Kylie (Stephanie Danielson), Desiree (Laura Jacobs), Billy (Grant Alan Ouzts), and Mia (Lauren Francesca)—emerge from a swamp having narrowly escaped from unseen assailants. Stumbling upon a deserted house, they break in and try to survive the night, Noah phoning his cousin Troit (Lachlan Buchanan) for help, who arrives with friend Chandi (Puja Mohindra) in tow.Muck is not so much a horror movie as it is an excuse to fill an hour and a half with hot, firm, nubile young women in varying states of undress. Barely a minute goes by without a flash of T&A, writer/director Steve Wolsh missing no opportunity to home in on the girls' impressive attributes; for this I am grateful, because without the constant supply of eye candy, Muck would be an almost unwatchable mess of a movie, with a wafer thin plot, dreadful performances and virtually no gore, most of the deaths occurring just off-screen. Wolsh also opts for some really irritating editing techniques during his so-called scary scenes; thankfully, the excessive visual gimmickry is not used whenever the lovely ladies are undressing.As if to further prove that Wolsh had no agenda other than to show sexy women in their scanties, he offers up zero exposition, leaving the origin of his attackers a total mystery and ending the film with a cliffhanger that suggests a distinct lack of ideas.

l-connelly93 So I decided to watch this whilst ill in bed because for some reason horror movies make me feel better. However this was a horror movie in a whole new sense of the word. As many other reviews have been quick to point out this film is essentially a soft core porno. But I don't feel like that it s the biggest issue, the plot makes little to no sense, characters are seemingly built up of low budget production clichés. Perhaps it's only redeeming quality is one of the main guys is almost self aware of the fact he's starring in a terrible horror film.Some of the shots are appetizing but as for everything else it is just a horrible mess of boobs and incoherent plot.

tucker-4 I genuinely have no idea why any woman in the 21st century would appear in this movie, don't get me wrong I'm not a radical feminist or a prude, but this was just pure soft core, rape fantasy exploitation.It doesn't even have an ending, it's like they just ran out of money and put the titles up.I like a bad movie, because sometimes they can pass right through bad and end up being genius (plan 9 from outer space) - but this was just bad.Absolutely no redeeming featuresAvoid, you can't get that time back.