PlatinumRead Just so...so bad

Lancoor A very feeble attempt at affirmatie action

Doomtomylo a film so unique, intoxicating and bizarre that it not only demands another viewing, but is also forgivable as a satirical comedy where the jokes eventually take the back seat.

Roy Hart If you're interested in the topic at hand, you should just watch it and judge yourself because the reviews have gone very biased by people that didn't even watch it and just hate (or love) the creator. I liked it, it was well written, narrated, and directed and it was about a topic that interests me.

Leofwine_draca This ill-conceived slice of straight-to-video fodder is pointless in every respect. A predictable, clichéd plot combines with a total disregard for logic and realism to scupper this project from the start. It's difficult to know who the film is aimed at; part erotic thriller, part sci fi hokum, it doesn't really know what it wants to be. So the makers decided to throw in a load of mumbo-jumbo and sets lifted straight out of THE FLY and mix it with the old standby of immortality in a bid to have an interesting premise. The result? They failed miserably.The main thrust of the film is that David Warner tricks Brian Krause into letting him project his own personality into his body. This is handled in such an incompetent manner that it's difficult to know, let alone care, what on earth is going on. Confused? You will be. The leaden acting of the lead, Brian Krause, also helps to destroy any interest this film might have held. Krause has a single expression on his face for the entire film and simply can't act. You're in a sad way when you get upstaged by Pamela Anderson. Speaking of old Pam, she pops up in a minor role in order to shed her clothes a couple of times. Is she as dizzy and bubble-headed as her reputation would suggest? In a word, yes. Other women appear naked in flashbacks for no other reason than to titillate the male viewer, so at least there is the unintentional humour value.Two veteran actors struggle to make the best of their roles but, to be honest, they're wasted. David Warner is hardly what you would call stretched in his role as an evil scientist, it's the same shtick we've seen him play a million times: apparently cultured and eloquent, but dastardly evil nonetheless. Dean Stockwell also pops up in what amounts to a cameo appearance, he is on screen for only five minutes of the film. There's some cheap, rubbishy-looking CGI work which offers no interest and a lack of gore and violence to further anger those die-hard horror fans. In all, it's a bit of a waste of time, and certainly not worth bothering with.

Jackson Booth-Millard Unfortunately I do not remember finishing this film for some reason, but it's another one of those thriller or drama like films that I basically only wanted to see for the chance of seeing good sex and nudity. The thing I most wanted to see when I heard about this film was obviously the chance that Baywatch's Pamela Anderson may show us her wonderful breasts. I didn't really pay much attention to the story, but I think the story is a Professor Everett Longstreet (The Omen's David Warner) has placed some kind of sensors into the stupid main man's body, so that he could feel what he feels, e.g. Pamela's body. Good, as far as I can remember!

vincentga If I think now the impossible doesn't exist it's cause for me make a so boring movie like that was impossible. Even in my best dream.But the reality proof I'm wrong since I watch this movie.I give this movie 1/10. And like many other boring movie the "1" is just for technical (image, sound, etc.)Actor/actress can't be good in a so bad movie. Again I'm so surprised some guys find money to "create" a so bad movie.Sorry Pam but even your breast can't save this movie.If you received this movie in gift, think it's a bad joke!

Ta'Lon I used to refer to Pam as "Dead Parrot Anderson" (a comment on her acting abilities), until I realised that this was an insult to the parrot in the Monty Python sketch, which was a FAR better actor.I think Pam's breasts are displayed in the first 4 minutes of this film - if this film was meant to be "erotic" in some way, there could at least have been some buildup to the sex scenes.Some more characterisation so that we could have a little interest in the people (up & coming artist, with brilliant but pre-occupied scientist boyfriend, lecherous "friend" after the girl - surely the scriptwriter could have done a little more with this situation) before Pam reveals all would have gone a long way. I have no objection to such scenes if they are really part of the plot, but here they were quite irrelevant.