Laikals The greatest movie ever made..!

Dotbankey A lot of fun.

Robert Joyner The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

Nicolas Ok... Let's be honest. It cannot be the best movie but is quite enjoyable. The movie has the potential to develop a great plot for future movies

ksf-2 Nina Conti starts by introducing herself, her monkey puppet, and her mentor Ken Campbell. When she is filming this documentary, Campbell has already died, and left all his ventril-o-quipment to her. In honor of Ken, she wants to bring the puppets to the ventriloquists' convention and to the dummy graveyard in Kentucky, Venthaven. Because of that (and possibly the need for income,) now there's a video recording of her trip to Kentucky. Fun connection: Ken Campbell was "Bartlett" in Fish Called Wanda. There's an overhanging sadness for part of the film, partly due to the rain falling, (which makes it difficult to carry puppets around), as well as the fact that Nina had been considering giving up the act but before she could talk with Ken about it, he had passed away. There's also a lot of humor in here... we watch as Nina carts a (really large) "dummy" of Ken Campbell around. and the games and interviews with the various puppeteers. The best part of all of this is that she treats all the puppets like members of a big family. At one point, she takes the "Granny" doll into the pool with her, and even dunks her under the water. Fun stuff. Written and directed by Nina herself. Very well done, and it's the perfect memorium to Ken.

The_Phantom_Projectionist While my ventriloquism-loving friends either laughed at the crudeness of Jeff Dunham or sang along with Terry Fator, I found myself pursuing the sheer quirkiness that is Nina Conti. Despite having released at least three shows on DVD, being featured in a Christopher Guest film, and being a regular both at comedy shows and in Youtube clips, true fame has eluded Conti, though I'm hopeful that her first solo film project here will give her greater North American recognition. As is her style, Conti uses her documentary to balance spontaneous humor and genuine human emotion for a sometimes-uncomfortable, always-entertaining tribute to her deceased mentor and spiritual center of the piece, theater maverick Ken Campbell.The gist of the "story" here is that Conti, feeling uncertain about her future as a performing ventriloquist and saddened by the death of Campbell, considers abandoning the art but first commits herself to visiting an international ventriloquists' convention in Kentucky. With her, she brings her own puppet (Monkey) along, as well as the puppets willed to her by Campbell - "uniquely bereaved objects" whom she tries to help reclaim their lost voices - one of which will finding a resting place at the Vent Haven museum.As much as I had been hoping to give this film a perfect score, a couple issues keep me from doing so. The first of these is the film's runtime: playing only for a slim sixty minutes, the movie mostly manages to avoid pacing problems until the very end, where its conclusion is inharmoniously rushed after the rest of the picture has been comfortably reflective. My second complaint is more of a personal one: people who don't follow Nina online will probably be immune to this, but fact is that I had already seen half of the movie's most powerful scenes before I had even bought it, as teasers. The episode wherein "Granny" takes a swim and when Nina has a "conversation" with Ken Campbell in puppet form are as simultaneously sweet and unnerving as anything, but there are only two or three other scenes of approximate gravity in the film, making it feel like I've been partially spoiled.Which, of course, is not to say that even the non-knockout scenes of the film aren't fun to watch. Newcomers to Conti's comedy style may do well to catch one or two of her online clips before submerging themselves in this piece, just to get a taste, but by and large it's accessible if only for its intrigue. Not only has Nina got the technical aspects of ventriloquism down pat, but her ability to create a rapport with her characters is second to none: though her material is often deconstructive, it rarely feels like she's only talking to herself, and her puppets are made to feel more aware and imbued with emotion than most others. Humor-wise, documentaries like this may be the best portal for Conti's material: judging by some of the feedback I've read, a few people don't "get" Nina's style, which may have to do with the fact that her comedy lies in how she and a character go about addressing a topic instead of setting up and delivering blatant jokes, and this is a perfect match for this kind of film, for the naturalness of her delivery and the flow of the movie makes it hard to imagine that anything you see was filmed more than once. Because Conti's film is a journey about a comedic ventriloquist and not an exhibition by a comedian who happens to use ventriloquism to get a laugh, the movie feels more like a genuine documentary than a show.Technically, the film is sound in a bare-bones sort of way, with no aesthetics beyond what was filmed but looking presentable nonetheless. The footage shot at the convention provides cameos for a good deal of other ventriloquists, plenty of them obscure but with at least two fairly famous sightings in Jay Johnson and Dan Horn. I wish that some of Nina's new puppets were given more time to expound, but as usual, both she and Monkey remain entertaining as the leading faces. I'm very glad that this film was made and is receiving the distribution that it is, and hope that Conti gets to develop similar projects in the future. This one's definitely worth a look.

Miles-10 I suppose that some ventriloquists and their devoted fans will find fault with this film. (Why does a ventriloquist not want to be a vent any more?; it's like a Hatfield not only being ashamed of being a hillbilly but making a documentary about it; the next family reunion down in the holler is gonna be mighty uncomfortable.) Anyway, the premise of this possibly staged(?) documentary is that Nina Conti is ambivalent about her profession (she is also an actress whose resume includes a few movies and TV series) and about to quit when she learns that her mentor, Ken Campbell, has died. (Everyone but me seems to take seriously the implication that they were lovers, although I take it as distinctly possible that their sexual attraction was never consummated; Freudians will note that Campbell was almost exactly the same age as Nina Conti's father, actor Tom Conti.) I for one do not think that Conti's ventriloquism act stinks, which only added to my puzzlement as to why she would even consider giving it up. (Maybe, as her performance at the Vent Convention suggests, she wants to transcend the traditional limits of what ventriloquism is supposed to be, and that seems a promising direction, judging from her act.)I particularly enjoy Conti's sense of humor, which I found completely disarming. Two examples: Introduced to a half dozen or so figures bequeathed to her by her mentor, Conti gives each of them new names, even though their former owner already named them, and when she simply names the owl figure "Owl," the figure says, "You put a lot of thought into these names, didn't you." Of course that isn't the "figure" speaking, that is the ventriloquist's self-deprecating humor. Later, her performance at a ventriloquism convention begins with her telling her figure, Monkey (she does put a lot of thought into the name thing, doesn't she), that they are standing before a room full of ventriloquists. "No pressure then," says Monkey.One of the things that this film goes into--including in archive footage of Campbell talking about it--is the psychology of ventriloquism. There is also a nice demonstration by Nacho Estrada who deconstructs ventriloquism by removing the traditional figure and bringing in other objects. (I think this is kind of related to where Conti is trying to go with her act.) Most eye-opening for a newcomer to the sociology of ventriloquism is the convention Conti attends. At a rather sterile hotel (Conti finds it depressing), in or near Ft. Mitchell, Kentucky (I'm not sure which, in or near), seemingly hundreds of ventriloquists gather annually and transform the place into a colorful and vibrant community. There is a ventriloquism museum nearby called Vent Haven, where the figures used by past ventriloquists have come to rest. There you will find Mortimer Snerd and Charlie McCarthy, the famous figures of the famous ventriloquist Edgar Bergen, father of actress Candace Bergen.I don't know if this rates as a spoiler so I am counting it as one, but I thought it somewhat odd--in view of the fact that the Vent Haven Museum figures are all labeled "Do Not Touch"--that Conti got one of Campbell's figures soaking wet in the hotel swimming pool, then rung it out, then decided that was the one she was going to donate to the museum; can you say doll abuse? She doesn't seem to have done these things with the intention of possibly donating a damaged figure; she was originally going to donate a bulldog figure and penultimately decided not to donate any figure. Finally she changed her mind--or rather, the figure she donated changed her mind. OK, that IS a spoiler.The figure she turned in was a good choice for donation; you realize that when you see the tag placed on the figure by the museum, describing its history.

paul2001sw-1 Nina Conti's film begins with the film-maker asking herself a peculiar question - is this a documentary? - which leads one to wonder, how doesn't she know? Bt the truth is, it is both a documentary and a performance, for Conti, a ventriloquist, is undoubtedly acting for the camera, yet also seems to reveal the extent to which so many practitioners of her art really do live through their creations. Conti seems more natural, almost, in character than as herself - and this is in effect why her former lover first encouraged her to take up the art, as a way of unleashing her creative side. Now he is dead, and this film is a kind of homage to him. Aside from Conti's own genius, what makes this potentially bizarre film work is what it has to say about the way that human beings choose their own characters; and how some of us manage to escape from them.