TrueJoshNight Truly Dreadful Film

Lancoor A very feeble attempt at affirmatie action

WillSushyMedia This movie was so-so. It had it's moments, but wasn't the greatest.

HottWwjdIam There is just so much movie here. For some it may be too much. But in the same secretly sarcastic way most telemarketers say the phrase, the title of this one is particularly apt.

cameo40 I generally like animated films, but I found this one to be more like a feature-length cartoon with little to interest an adult audience. The several scenes of Tigger and Piglet falling from high places reminded me of a Road Runner cartoon, and Pooh's singing and simple missives on life--although true to the Winnie-the-Pooh franchise--seemed excessively sappy. Most of Disney's newer animated features have inside jokes, clever dialogue, and memorable songs that will help keep adults entertained while they watch with their kids. Pooh's Grand Adventure is lacking any of that. This straight-to-video movie will probably hold the attention of small children for an hour, but I would recommend parents find something else to do while their kids watch.

Rectangular_businessman Well, from all the Winnie the Pooh animations that I've seen (so far) this has to be the "darkest" one (At least, for the usual Winnie the Pooh standards) However, I don't consider that to be a bad thing, in fact, it was one of the main reasons of why this little film kept my interest from beginning to end, being a bit (just a bit) more serious than the other films based on the same character, but it does still have the charming quality that the Winnie the Pooh have.Even when this isn't a masterpiece, or a life-changing experience, I consider "Pooh's Grand Adventure: The Search for Christopher Robin" to be a pretty good film, being very well animated (With beautiful sceneries and very appealing designs) and being also very enjoyable to watch.This was a cute film, with a good message. Like I said before, even when this could be considered as a bit "darker" (Not very much, actually) than the other animations based on the same characters, it is still something pleasant, tender and good-spirited, appropriate for the whole family.8.5/10

restless-2 My daughter was scared by the setting last year when she was two. Much more eerie than one would suspect a Winnie Pooh film to be. So we put the film aside until this year. Now she enjoys watching the film. Still she has to watch some scenes with an adult by her side. Not suitable for dinner preparation TV.The film clearly benefits from including all the original characters. Unlike some of the other films which exclude OWL, a character dearly loved by all our family--ever since the stormy day film.So, great for bigger preschool children but unsuitable for toddlers. Buy Tigger's Movie or the 1977 film instead if you have a young child.

Richard Harris (Norway1) Keeping in mind that most of the crew from the original Classic are not "just around Pooh corner" this sequel could have been much more disappointing (Did I say "much"?). Disney did what they could by at least using the original voices to both Piglet and Tigger, but it appears to be just another attempt at raking in some cash. Jim Cummings shows amazing talent in his attempt to mimic the timeless voice of Sterling Holloway, however as the narrator, David Warner can't hold a candle to Sebastian Cabot. Disney could have made an extreme improvement had they chosen to follow the original technique of having it as though read from a book with chapters (showing the pages turning, etc.). Children will probably enjoy it (as is it's aim), but try not to set your hopes too high if you're over 10-12.