Fairaher The film makes a home in your brain and the only cure is to see it again.

Robert Joyner The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

Asad Almond A clunky actioner with a handful of cool moments.

Ezmae Chang This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

moonspinner55 An intimate sit-down conversation with filmmaker Roman Polanski, conducted by his long-time friend, Laurent Bouzereau, takes place after Polanski was detained and arrested in Switzerland in 2009 after arriving from Paris to attend a film festival. The warrant for Polanski stemmed from an arrest in Los Angeles in 1977, after the director fled the United States before going to court on a statutory rape case involving an underage girl. Polanski, having recently served nine weeks in solitary confinement before being placed under house arrest, is in a Zen-like mood, reflective and thoughtful. The only emotion he sidesteps is regret. He wonders when "all this" will end, he worries what toll his arrest will take on his wife and children, without contemplating why he was arrested or what he can personally do to bring an end to this chapter in his life. Bouzereau is soft on his friend, he doesn't prod Polanski or drag answers out of him, and yet maybe that's what Polanski needs to wake up. The man is an artist, a celebrity, a husband and a father, but he's also half-asleep--perhaps as a way to ignore his problems. They're not just going to go away. **1/2 from ****

l_rawjalaurence Other critics have commented on the way in which interviewer Andrew Braunsberg gives Polanski a relatively easy ride over the incident that defined his career; his arrest in the late Seventies for having sex with an underage girl. What this film suggests is that Polanski has 'done his time,' so to speak for the crime; not only was he prevented from re- entering the United States, but he was detained for several months in a Swiss jail before being finally released. In truth ROMAN POLANSKI: A MEMOIR is less preoccupied with this single incident and more with Polanski's harrowing childhood as he grew up in a Poland overrun by Nazis, faced the indignities of seeing his mother, father and sister taken away; lived in a ghetto provided by the Nazi for Jews in Poland; and then ran away just in the nick of time from a Nazi soldier shooting at him for fun. After a fledgling career as an actor, Polanski went to film school and released his first major work in 1962. Even when he achieved fame, tragedy dogged him; his second wife Sharon Tate was brutally murdered by Charles Manson, simply for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. While Braunsberg is a sympathetic interviewer, he does not skate over these harrowing details in Polanski's life; for his part, Polanski responds to the questions as comprehensively as he can, even though some of the memories of his life are still hard for him to endure. ROMAN POLANSKI: A MEMOIR allows the director to speak with the minimum of intervention; a few title-cards fill in the gaps not covered by the interview. Definitely required viewing for anyone interested in the career of the great director, as well as those concerned with film history in Europe.

Ron Altman Interesting documentary about master filmmaker Polanski, who is visited by his friend and business partner of nearly 50 years, Andrew Braunsberg, in his Swiss chalet in Gstaad, while under house arrest for the rape charges dating back to 1977. Polanski gives a very personal insight in his early life, from childhood during World War Two, to his early acting career and later personal tragedy with Sharon Tate. Highly interesting, even touching, this is recommended to any film fan. Some of his films are neglected, some not even mentioned, but what you get to hear is fascinating. Polanski sometimes has to fight back tears. Good piano score by Alexandre Desplat.

shanayneigh Laurent Bouzereau isn't exactly well known for hard hitting questions in his documentaries, but this one takes the cake.Roman Polanski's friend (that alone should set the alarm bells off) Andrew Braunsberg is the one asking the questions, and it becomes painfully clear why they have a personal friend of Polanski interview him: So he can be asked lowball questions allowing Polanski to rant freely about the supposedly unfair shake he got from the legal system. Not only does the interviewer fail to deliver any follow up questions - he actually aggressively supports Polanski.Here's what happened: Polanski gave drugs to an underage girl whom he proceeded to rape. Whether she consented or not, as some Polanski defenders claim, is inconsequential as a minor can not consent to sex, thus rape.How does the interviewer - that is, Polanski's friend - approach this issue? The verbatim quotes are: "... and suddenly you had this experience with Samantha" "... 33 years since the case with Samantha occurred" Not once are the actual details of the case presented. Not once are drugs mentioned. Not once is rape mentioned. It's transformed into an abstract "experience" or "case" that "occurred" with a presumably helpless and passive Polanski as the true victim.But you can rest assured that Polanski is given plenty of time to lament over how unfairly the justice system treated him, how scary jail was, and how he was forced to leave the country. Poor Roman living in luxury in Europe for the rest of his life! By now the interviewer's lower lip is trembling with sadness, and he several times feels compelled to point out how he so admires Roman for having overcome so much adversity in his life. I was fully expecting this documentary to turn into Brokeback Mountain.