Saboteur

1942 "Unmasking The Man Behind Your Back!"
7.1| 1h48m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 24 April 1942 Released
Producted By: Universal Pictures
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Aircraft factory worker Barry Kane flees across the United States after he is wrongly accused of starting the fire that killed his best friend.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Universal Pictures

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

ChicRawIdol A brilliant film that helped define a genre
Rio Hayward All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.
Jayden-Lee Thomson One of the film's great tricks is that, for a time, you think it will go down a rabbit hole of unrealistic glorification.
Isbel A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.
poetcomic1 There are a handful of sublimely 'Hitchcockian' moments in this 'picaresque' American version of The 39 Steps. A truly sinister moment is the beginning of the aircraft plant fire with jet black smoke coiling and expanding across the back drop of the vast metal doors of the aircraft plant. It is quite beautiful. The shoot out in Radio City Music Hall is a classic set piece, one of Hitch's best. The Nazi agent reminiscing about his beautiful blond curls as a boy is a touch worthy of Bunuel! Hitch always said it should have been the hero dangling from the Statue of Liberty but I disagree. At that moment of vertiginous terror we are forced to identify with the ferret-faced, fragile, pathetic little monster, Fry whose death is caused by his own cheap suit. Morally it is more complex and satisfying than the reversed role (as in North By Northwest). Norman Lloyd's fall from the statue was one of the truly great special effects of classic cinema and is unforgettable.Both Bob Cummings and Priscilla Lane are not 'A-list' but they give all they have for Hitch and he appreciated it. He even used Cummings again in Dial M for Murder.
petra_ste Saboteur belongs to the group I call "middle Hitch" - neither among his timeless masterpieces (Psycho, Rear Window, Vertigo...) nor among his very good movies (To Catch a Thief, Suspicion...), but still better than his rare weak efforts (Jamaica Inn, Frenzy...).The "middle Hitch" includes breezy, fun genre movies (The Lady Vanishes, Young and Innocent...), with flashes of genius here and there. Saboteur follows the "innocent man on the run" template which the director had been tackling since The 39 Steps and which will peak decades later with North by Northwest. Leads Robert Cummings and Priscilla Lane are lightweight but likable; the story of a young man wrongly accused of sabotage who must escape the police and find the real culprit is entertaining, although Hitchcock's own assessment (in one of his insightful interviews with Truffaut) that the script lacks discipline and is cluttered with too many ideas seems accurate.7/10
disinterested_spectator "You look like a saboteur," Pat says to Barry accusatively.What are we to make of this remark? First of all, there is reality. We all know as a general rule, saboteurs do not have a distinctive look. Now, inasmuch as World War II had just broken out, I suppose that if Barry had been Japanese or German, her remark would have been appropriate. Of course, today we would call that racial profiling, but since this movie was made in 1942, she could have gotten away with it. But Barry does not appear to be either.Second, there is type casting. A movie producer might call up an agent, and say, "We're making a spy movie. Do you have anyone who looks like a saboteur? If so, send him over for an interview." And then the agent might send over someone like Norman Lloyd, the man who plays the saboteur named Fry in the movie. But the agent would not have sent over Robert Cummings.Third, there is the reason why Pat said it. After she expresses her difficulty in believing that any American would be a saboteur, Barry responds, "Well, you believe it about me!" She replies that he is different, because he looks like a saboteur. And that is peculiar, because neither reality nor movie stereotyping would make anyone say that about someone who looks like Robert Cummings. Besides, she had a very good reason for thinking he was a saboteur, which has nothing to do with his looks. When she first met him, she saw that he was wearing handcuffs, and she realized that he was the fugitive the police were looking for.Actually, it is precisely because Barry does not look like a saboteur that he is able to avoid the police. After he jumps out of the police car, he jumps from the bridge into the river below. The truck driver that had earlier given him a ride recognizes him, and he misdirects the police so that Barry can escape. Now, why would anyone do that? I would have helped the police by pointing out where Barry was hiding. All we can conclude is that the truck driver figured Barry did not look like a criminal, so he helped him escape.Barry takes shelter in a blind man's house. When his niece Pat turns up, and she sees the handcuffs that her uncle Philip already knew about on account of his acute hearing, she says he should have turned him in to the police. Her uncle accuses her of being cruel. He assures her that Barry is not dangerous. And besides, he argues, a man is innocent until proved guilty. Now, because Philip is blind, he obviously cannot be coming to these incredible conclusions simply on account of Barry's looks. But Philip tells Pat that he can see intangible things, like innocence.Pat pretends to go along with what her uncle wants, which is to take Barry to a blacksmith to get the handcuffs off, but she tries to take him to the police instead. That doesn't work, however, and after some complications, they find themselves in the company of some circus freaks. Some of them want to turn Barry over to the police, who are inspecting the circus trucks, but the deciding vote is the bearded lady who blathers about how fine it is that Pat has stuck with Barry through his difficulties, and therefore they must be good people. This makes about as much sense as when earlier a man and a woman saw Barry kidnap Pat, dragging her into the car against her will, and the woman said, "My, they must be terribly in love."What these three instances—that of the truck driver, Uncle Philip, and the freaks—have in common is that appearances, in one form or another, make people decide to thwart the police and help the fugitive. Toward the end of the movie, Tobin, one of the villains, says of Barry that he is noble, fine, and pure, and that is why he is misjudged by everyone. But save for the police, Barry is not misjudged by others. The point of this line is to show just how much evil foreigners underestimate Americans. Americans, being basically noble, fine, and pure, can readily see the goodness in others, which is why they are willing to help a fugitive from justice escape from the police: they can just tell that Barry is noble, fine, and pure.In some ways, this movie reminds us of "The 39 Steps" (1935), made several years earlier. In that movie, a man is also falsely suspected of being a spy and has to convince a woman that he is really a good guy. There is a pair of handcuffs in that movie too, except that the man and woman are handcuffed together in that one. However, "Saboteur" also made me think of "Shadow of a Doubt" (1943), which Hitchcock made just a year later, in which appearances, instead of being dependable, turn out to be deceptive. Perhaps the one was a reaction to the other.
LeonLouisRicci Underrated Hitchcock Propaganda Piece that has Many Stunning Sequences and a Few that Don't Quite Work. It is Entertaining and Enjoyable with a Good Deal of Suspense Amidst the Shenanigans.Robert Cummings is Much Better Here than in His Later Role for Hitch in Dial M for Murder (1954) and Priscilla Lane is Bland but OK. It is the Slimy Villains that Shine. Otto Krueger is On His Game as a Snooty Traitor that Can't Abide Americans that He Calls Stupid. Norman Lloyd is Also Remarkable as Frank Fry the True Saboteur.The Fantastic Opening from the Credits to the Blazing Act of the Title are Prime Hitchcock and Ultra-Stylish. The Soda City Scenes are Ominous and Introduce Another Great Villain, Alan Baxter as an Effeminate Baddie that Likes to Dress His Youngest Son in Girls Clothes and Never Cuts His Hair, because His Mother did the Same. That is Pure Freudian Hitchcock and the Scene Tingles.The Circus Caravan is Also Offbeat as is the Scene with the Blind Man. They Echo Freaks (1931) and The Bride of Frankenstein (1935), as Hitch Pays Homage to Two Great American Films. The Scene that Works the Least is the Clunky Movie Theatre Thing where Patrons are Yucking it Up as a Gangster Sprays Bullets Everywhere. The Scene Seems Awkward and is Completely Goofy.The Shipyard and the Statue of Liberty Pieces are as Good as the Opening and Highlight the Movie Along with a Fast Pace. One Can Overlook the 1942 Speechifying Rallying the Citizens. Mention Should Also be Given to the Words About the Rich and Respectable Class that are Given a Pass Because of Their Status in Society. Barry Kane States this More than Once and it is a Profound Warning and a Nod to an American Ideal, Not Always Adhered to, that Everyone is Equally Innocent Under the Law. The Film is Rich Enough with This Type of Thing and the Craftsmanship is So Pristine that its Flaws Can be Forgiven.