Simple Men

1992 "They're good boys with bad attitude!"
7.1| 1h45m| R| en| More Info
Released: 14 October 1992 Released
Producted By: Fine Line Features
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Dennis is a handsome and bookish college student. His brother, Bill, is a roughhewn ladies' man and thief. Together they search for their dad, confront their expectations of each other, themselves, and their attitudes towards women.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Fine Line Features

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

PlatinumRead Just so...so bad
Stevecorp Don't listen to the negative reviews
Invaderbank The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.
Robert Joyner The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one
Deniz Ziya Toroslu The biggest problem of the movie is that the movie has no effect at all which I recently learned that they call it deadpan. The reactions of the characters are extremely soulless. The movie is not humorous because of those except the famous dance scene and the guy who helps Kate. This short part is the only interesting part and the guy is the only acceptable character of the movie, as said, all the other characters are too emotionless. This cannot be explained by nihilism or Godard's 'anti-cinema' style. Simple Men is not a road movie, despite the main story is that two brothers leave the city to find their father. I had expected an interesting and colorful road movie, at least a movie. There is an emptiness feeling throughout the movie, so if you expect any kind of dramatic or stunning material, you disappoint seriously. Again because of this deadpan style of the director, no art, no entertainment. Cinematography is just OK, but owing to the problems mentioned above, finally the film is lack of an impressive cinema experience. The director puts up a solid wall between the movie and audiences, I don't mean catharsis or I don't mean empathy, these are not must, but this wall makes the movie distasteful and soulless. Some people complain about acting in the movie, but acting was not weak, there is no problem with acting, it was plausible. The thing makes them think like that is probably deadpan that the director likes. By the way, Simple Men is not predictable, but does not include any twist or surprise.
Freemheart It was just a little mistake changing the channel, but after watch a few scenes of a low budget film with Robert John Burke talking great dialogue, couldn't move my eyes from the TV till the movie end. It wasn't the good cast or the style of low budget, It was the whole story taking a deep vision about the life and the love. After that I became a fan of Hal Hartley, because every movie of him shows another piece of the life in the hell in a way more realistic and with less violence than many great independent directors. The world of Hartley and Simple men it's the path of loyalty to a vision of the universe, where the pain and the innocence are the main actors of the story.
jtur88 I'm pretty tolerant of films that are off-beat, but really! This is the kind of film that makes one observe that the director might make some pretty good films when he grows up. The first scene gave me the expectation that in a minute or two, a curtain would come down and the audience would clap politely, and the amateur actors would leave the stage and move on to the real movie. But they just moved to other stages, where they kept on reading their lines as if they were dictating to a stenographer. Try to imagine an episode of "Twin Peaks" starring Lindsay Crouse. You got it. After 30 minutes, I switched and watched something else---then when I came back 2 hours later, another Hartley film was airing ("Amateurs")---which actually did capture my interest. Not great, but I stuck it out to the end. Too many forced bits that made me think of the Aykroyd-Hanks "Dragnet".
kgh-3 The power of the movie camera is its voyeuristic capabilities, peering in at various affairs, public and intimate, of people portrayed by actors. It is undetected by them as they go about their business. Hitchcock brought this metaphor to life in Rear Window as Jimmy Stewart peered into his neighbors' lives with his camera. There is, however, a school of film-making that breaks from this model; let's call it the nudge-nudge, wink-wink school of film-making. In this style the actors are all aware of the camera, behaving not naturally, but rather in a posed way, a way that says, "Look, I'm doing this for you, the viewer." Films in this school often feature stilted dialogue and wooden acting. If this is a style that you enjoy, then Simple Men is for you.