Hellen I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Incannerax What a waste of my time!!!

Rio Hayward All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

Tyreece Hulme One of the best movies of the year! Incredible from the beginning to the end.

lastliberal Let's just make one thing perfectly clear. When Howie (Kevin G. Shinnick) turns over and passes on his wife (Debbie Rochon), you know that things are screwy. Give me a break! Passing on Debbie for Julian Wells. I mean, she is nice, and she did spend most of the film showing her nice boobies and generous booty, but hey dude, nobody passes on Debbie.This was, as far a I know the first time that Rochon played a real zombie, as she came back from her death to take revenge. It wasn't as bloody as I would have liked in this type of film, but it was good.Misty Mundae also appeared briefly as a hooker, but we mostly just got to see her head bobbing up and down before it was cruelly jerked too far to the right. Poor Misty was just with the wrong people.This was a first film for writer/director Justin Wingenfeld, and he has talent. It is hoped that he continues to improve.

slake09 Obviously some who were involved with the production of this movie are reviewing it, otherwise it would have a uniformly low score.Let's not bother with the plot here, it's already been mentioned by other reviewers and is neither original nor noteworthy.The production values are generally acceptable, with decent camera work, and acting that is at least as bad as you know it's going to be. Maybe worse. I'm OK with average to low production if some element of the film makes up for that. That's not the case with this movie.What they're trying to sell this movie on is sex and horror: the movie contains very little of either. Forget the review where they mention all the different kinds of sex in this movie - you don't see any of it. You'll see even less horror, unless your idea of horror is being terrified at the idea these people would be allowed to make a movie.There aren't enough special effects to mention, the dialog is about the same as you would expect from an elementary school stage play, and the nudity is confined to some lightweight T&A, less than you'd see on late night cable. You would be better off paying a couple neighborhood skanks to dance around your living room. Squirt a little ketchup on them and you'd have about the same amount of horror this movie contains.

siuxie To be honest - worst move I've ever seen, I could't stand it, after watching it for 15 minutes I just stopped. Awfully directed, actors were really I mean REALLY bad, the plot had no point. I wonder who gave money to produce such crap? Don't waste your time and money to rent this movie. And the good review must have been written by director himself. I only have one recommendation - people don't bother. I must say - I have seen lots of bad movies but this one is a complete mistake. Special effects - what special effects... Good acting - I'd say no acting at all. I'd rather recommend it as a great sleeping pill. Make up your mind before you see this movie.

brandy74 I'm sorry, I like to think of myself as one who will give any movie a fighting chance but, I started skipping chapters in the DVD before the first chapter was even close complete. I kept hoping that the overall effect would improve, it didn't. The acting was horrible. The dialog was corny at best (to the point it wasn't even laughable). The wardrobe was able to be passed off as era appropriate. The makeup could have been done better if a fifteen year old had done it! All in all I kept being reminded of a horribly made 1970's x-rated movie, all that was missing is cameo by Ron Jeremy. The overall badness didn't have me mustering the time or energy to give this one half of a fighting chance.