Flyerplesys Perfectly adorable

Platicsco Good story, Not enough for a whole film

Konterr Brilliant and touching

Kimball Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.

arkrandomkindness Watching this for the first time as a 20 year old with my little brother who is 11. He liked the film but even he was questioning why the film was not like 1 and 2.I don't understand the reason or point as to why the makers of this film decided to make the 3rd film fully 3D Animation. Being in the wild and the only characters that would need 100% CGI in a LIVE ACTION film would be Stuart (already in their computer systems and design), and the Beast. All the rest would of been much easier/simple to film live surely?The story line was a little loose. It was good but loose. The story consists of Stuart, and his family going on a scouts camping trip in the woods. Once again Stuarts Mother over panics for his protection, the jokes made are awful and not funny. Later into the film Stuart freiends a Skunk he meets which later tricks his own friend Snowbell into offering himself to the Beast. Stuart later goes on a mission to stop the Beast and his Skunk friend and the forest animals also help.The story line could of been MUCH better done really, perhaps having a better road trip scenes would of added a bit more. Also would of been cool to of had more than one bad guy for the 3rd film finale. I was also disappointed the girl bird Margalo had not returned. Being such an important role character Stuart liked, I would of liked to see her have returned to Stuart.Overall and to Conclude, the biggest disappointment was having the first 2 films go from LIVE ACTION to 3D Animation. Its like making Star Wars 1, 2 3 4 5 6, and then they make 7, 8 ,9 into cartoon. It just does not work, and it feels wrong, non consistent and cheesy when you watch it. The other slight appointment was again the story lacked fun, and characters from previous films.

Michael O'Keefe School is out for the summer and the Little family are ready to vacation in the forest of Lake Garland. Frederick(voiced by Hugh Laurie)and Elanor(voiced by Genna Davis)round up Stuart(voiced by Michael J. Fox)and Snowball the cat and hit the holiday road. Stuart and his dad join a group of scouts. Stuart just doesn't fit in of course; but soon has his mind occupied with finding Snowball, who is believed to be snatched by a forest creature known as the Beast(voiced by Virginia Madsen). Joining Stuart in the search is a skunk named Reeko(voiced by Wayne Brady). The first two Stuart Little films combined live action with animation. CALL OF THE WILD is obviously working with a small budget and is completely CGI, and not the best by no means. Quality is lacking, but four and five year old viewers will not be concerned. Other voices: Peter MacNicol, Nathan Lane, Robby D. Bruce, Sophia Paden and Kevin Schon.

Hollywood_Yoda I must admit that this film was very well animated compared to other animated films of the same time frame. It looks more realistic, which compared to the first two films is excellent. And the voice-over work in this film is by far excellent. Most of the cast from the first two returned, with the exception of Jonathan Lipnicki. But Wayne Brady's voice appears in the film as Reeko the skunk. Thats a plus.Some of the scenes though, very much reminded me of scenes from earlier Disney films. For instance, the lioness on the rock is reminiscent of Pride Rock from "The Lion King." And the name of the skunk is Reeko, very similar to Meeko from "Pocahontas." Even the forest animals are very similar to those in "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs" and "Bambi." The animation. although well done, seems to be a rip off of Disney films.After careful consideration, I gave this film a 6.

nickmedford After the first two films, with their lavish sets, excellent acting, and state-of-the-art CGI, this comes as a massive disappointment. It's an ultra-low budget animation, so poorly drawn that it looks like a rough draft rather than a finished animation. The cast who played the Little family in the previous films return to voice their characters here, but the dubbing is so haphazard that you'll swear that different actors were used. The plot is paper-thin, the jokes are mostly lame, and even the very young are likely to get bored well before the end. A great shame, as the first Stuart Little in particular was a great hit with my daughter, and one of the best children's films of recent years. Stuart Little 3 is, however, best avoided.