Lucybespro
It is a performances centric movie
Dynamixor
The performances transcend the film's tropes, grounding it in characters that feel more complete than this subgenre often produces.
Cristal
The movie really just wants to entertain people.
stevenmellier
Some really good gags and ideas in the first 30 minutes, but the following Story didn't work well to me. It could have been a furious comedy
Filipe Neto
After the good box-office performance of "Ted", this sequel was already predictable. It is especially recommended to those who liked the first film and especially advised against all people whose good sense and good taste prevented them from properly enjoying it. The film brings nothing new, just continuing the story of the obscene and rude teddy bear that shone in the initial film. Unfortunately, the manners and behavior of the creature have in no way improved, continuing to be the perfect mirror of a generation of teenagers with no prospects of life, no education, no manners and obsessed with everything that has to do with sex, alcohol or induce hallucinogenic states. The film is supposed to be a comedy but, viewed from this perspective, it takes on tragic and deeply unhappy contours. But I'm not surprised. I was not expecting Seth MacFarlane, a man who likes to make movies and serials with offensive and provocative humor, had suddenly turned into an Amish or something like that. But I remain in doubt whether the art of cinema needed another junk-film for its vast collection. In any case, the film has an advantage (the only one): as a social critic, it allows us all to think whether we want to be equal or better than that bear, and allows me (and others like me) to write texts like this.
soul-l
There is no masterpiece here folks, this isn't Green Mile, it's a movie about a drug using teddy bear. I always rank comedy films differently than any other movie because to me all that matters is the laughs. This movie packs plenty of chuckles as you follow the life of Ted, a peter griffin sounding bong smoking Teddy Bear. If there was one major fault of the first Ted, it was that they made an attempt to make it a "good" movie. What started of as hilarious turned into Hancock and got mildly depressing, but this time around they nail it. The movie starts dumb, stays dumb, and ends dumb, all while making me laugh to the point of tears. This is why I view this film as much better than the first one, if you're in the mood to laugh and you enjoy Family Guy type humor than you won't be disappointed. I certainly hope they stick to this formula and we get to see more shenanigans from the worlds most vulgar teddy bear. (PS. Morgan Freeman is in it if you weren't already convinced)
agostino-dallas
It is creative...it is outrageously funny and so not politically correct1 It has like any movies moments of pure comedy art and moments you realize the director screwed up. I had a ball watching Ted-2 but I think Ted-1 was of course much more spontaneous and sequels are sequels. They are OK but they also need to pay the bills and if creativity is not happening again, just stuff a lot of clichés in the movies and finish the freaking thing. I wish Ted was around when I was like 10, 12...it wasn't. The closest thing I remember being politically incorrect and funny was the movie Airplane-II, back in 1982. I think there is opportunity to Ted-3 but it has to be bold enough to mock politicians; religion and society again!
