IslandGuru
Who payed the critics
Brendon Jones
It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.
Ortiz
Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.
Dana
An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.
DansHauntedHouseful
The Amityville Horror certainly isn't the best haunted house film out there, but it's not so bad. In fact I'll say it's "pretty good," so long as "pretty good" stands for slightly less than "good." The establishing shots of the house are excellent. Who can forget those creepy attic windows that look like jack-o-lantern eyes! I love the background music. Now-a-days, creepy music is often replaced by the sounds of electronic jolts and thuds. Who can resist those singing children and their haunting "la la's"? I sure can't! The book is better, but the film stands on its own. The book is able to cover more ground, but that is to be expected since the book has 300 + pages compared to the film's 2 hours of footage. What the film is able to capture with its limited amount of time is done reasonably well. The mood is eerie, the characters are mostly well developed, especially Rod Stieger as Father DeLaney. Katherine Lutz's character could have used a bit more development.For a more comprehensive review of the Amityville Saga, please check my IMDb profile and for the link to my blog - TheBooksofDaniel
thiszizlife
The fly scene with the priest will never get old. Then never resolves to anything substantial. We find something is disturbing the priest enough that he pukes outside by his car. Everything seems find for George and the gang. They had to have been drinking TAB soda as they were fixing up the place. Haven't seen that soda in a while. Love how Stuart Rosenberg adds in the old stuff, too. Them old school wall pencil sharpeners in the kitchen and, rotary phone. There is something about this place that George likes since, he buys one of the old lamps that broke during the murder that took place there. The dialogue for starters in this film is family-like. And Kathy and George are a trip. George gets cold and says. "This house is supposed to be well- insulated." Where did this line come from? Why inform us of this now and not when the realtor was present. Skipping ahead to the love scene, it could be better. I like how he looks at her and says, "Kathy, I love you." This also builds feeling in both characters and we see them as humans and we feel for them. Great job! Rosenberg. This film carries us through a destructive tide of disorder at its best. That family dinner table fight. That car argument with someone. I think we have all been there and can relate. Rosenberg knows this and does a great job of bringing this out during the babysitter closet scene. The real incident of this took place in New York, resident address of 112 Ocean Avenue. This did not take place in Detroit. This kind of ruins the authenticity factor. Yep, that went right out the door. And, there was no car being possessed in the original story. The use of atmosphere makes this film enjoyable. Some houses are just creepy and this is one of them. Those old houses with those stairway basements are just nasty! Kathy would be much better off with Father Bolen. This film suggests that. That we never really see the good until it's too late and we are stuck in marriage. A lot of this film sucks you into nothing happening scenes that could very well be omitted. Things start to pick up towards the end of the film and Rosenberg I think is at his best. Lot of unnecessary effects that steal the suspense. I would have loved the run through action in this film a lot better without the musical score. In a film like this you want to hear the screams, be involved in the tension build up of what's going on with the characters, and not detached from them by this music. The main theme in the credit roll would have been better if Rosenberg utilized it during George's walkarounds of the boathouse.
jacobjohntaylor1
This is one of the scariest movies from the 70's. Amityville II The possession is scarier. Amityville 4 the evil escapes is also scarier. Amityville cures is also scarier. Amityville it's about time is also scarier. Amityville the new generation is also scarier. Amityville dollhouse is also scarier. The 2005 remake of The Amityville horror is also scarier. But still this is a very scary movie. It has a great story line. It also has great acting. It also has great special effects. 6.2 is underrating it. I give it 9 out of 10 because it is a great horror film. I need more lines and I am running out of thing to say.
Leofwine_draca
I'm a sucker for a good old-fashioned haunted house movie and THE AMITYVILLE HORROR is one of those all right – with the added frisson of being (supposedly) based on a true story! It's a film made at the tail-end of the 1970s replete with that fine '70s atmosphere. And atmosphere is what this film is all about; it creates a truly sinister look and feel as it depicts what happens to the innocent Lutz family after they move into a house that was the site of a previous massacre. From the title cards telling us the days of the week (building up a fine sense of foreboding) to the constant weird things going on, this film is predictable and entertainingly so. Swarms of bluebottles appearing out of nowhere, a sinister hidden room in the basement, a priest haunted by a sinister spirit, a weird pig-creature in the window, blood pouring down the walls, a crucifix turning upside down, a guy getting possessed by a killer spirit and more besides
what's not to love here? Okay, so the film has some rough edges. For the most part, though, it's surprisingly undated, especially as the special effects are kept simple and down to earth. The cast is also decent: I don't like Margot Kidder, but she gives a suitably scared turn here, although Christian Bale look-alike James Brolin has the stand-out turn as the guy becoming increasingly deranged. Rod Steiger is good value, as always, as the priest enduring a run of extremely bad luck.I first saw this film a good decade ago and found it creepy and powerful and seeing it now in the modern age I find it just as creepy, with the demonic voice shouting 'get out!' still the scary highlight. Up there with THE ENTITY and POLTERGEIST as the best this genre has to offer. This is also one of the rare instances in which the remake (released in 2005) manages to be as good, if not better, as the original.