Interesteg What makes it different from others?

DipitySkillful an ambitious but ultimately ineffective debut endeavor.

Stephanie There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

Abegail Noëlle While it is a pity that the story wasn't told with more visual finesse, this is trivial compared to our real-world problems. It takes a good movie to put that into perspective.

Phil Hubbs Or as I refer to it...the William Shatner marathon of self indulgent memories, OK OK I jest. Directed, produced and written by the Shat himself, a one man army exploring the difficulties, struggles, stigmas and sacrifices that accompany the huge responsibility of playing the captain of the starship Enterprise. But as you can guess from the title Shatner travels around the globe (kinda) to seek out the other captains where ever they may be and natter about the past.So as all Trekkies will know the other captains interviewed in this documentary are Patrick Stewart, Scott Bakula, Avery Brooks, Kate Mulgrew and Chris Pine. Obviously this being a Star Trek feature you can't ignore other cast members from the TV shows and movies so you also get to see and hear from people like Christopher Plummer, Johnathan Frakes, Robert Picardo, Rene Auberjonois etc...Its an across the board (across the ages) feature that delves deep...or does it?One by one Shatner meets up with his fellow acting colleagues to discuss all things Star Trek and portraying the various captains...but actually they don't! To my surprise much of the conversations to begin with tend to revolve around their past work, previous jobs and gigs, how they started in acting etc...One or two of them even chat about their other skills and interests such as singing and playing instruments (Bakula and Brooks). Now don't get me wrong this is all quite interesting for the most part (I never knew Bakula was a singer), but I kinda wanted to hear about all things Star Trek, not their personal lives or backgrounds before hand. The whole point to this documentary was for Shatner to express how he and his fellow colleagues coped with the daily pressures of playing the captain in a hit show. The long slog of making many episodes with long hours over many years and then the inevitable typecasting that would follow afterwards. We do get this but it takes a bit of time for the cast to get onto this subject. Like I said at first its mostly about what they did before Star Trek which I personally wasn't too bothered about. Eventually all the stars talk about their own personal demons and hindrances along the way with Stewart mentioning how hard it was to follow on from the original series and the character of Kirk, to Mulgrew talking about how tough it was trying to raise her kids whilst making the show. You do learn some interesting tit bits but nothing overly earth shattering or that you haven't heard before. Its cool to see all the cast members (although this was four years ago now). Bakula still has a youthful energetic persona and looks, Mulgrew is still the same but a little rounder in the face, Stewart never really seems to change, Pine is of course still young so no change there, but the most surprising thing was Brooks coming across as a tad eccentric in his old age...but pleasantly so. He seemed a bit lost in his own world, not really concentrating, distant and as though he was unaware of what was going on, but happy at least.The odd interviews with other stars briefly cover what they experienced on the TV show or movie, depending, again its not all Star Trek as they do touch on their past careers. There is also some convention footage with Shatner which is cool, we hear how Shatner never used to like the conventions and avoided them, but over time realised how important they were and how much attention he got (yep we all the Shat by now). Even though the feature is suppose to be about all the ex-captains it naturally tends to focus more on Shatner and his issues but I guess it is his production. I did get the impression Shatner was kinda fishing for compliments from the other cast members, almost looking for a shoulder to cry at some points. At the end he reveals how much he disliked the character of Kirk but has now come to accept him and enjoy the notion that he will forever be remembered as Kirk. Did Shatner really need to make an entire documentary supposedly about all the Star Trek captains just to show us this revelation? Well I'll let you decide that one.Honesty there isn't much that is discussed that will blow you away, its pleasant listening and viewing but overall it feels a little bit unnecessary at times. I really dunno why Shatner didn't just call the doc 'The Captain' whilst including the other cast members as its really all about him. That's not a bad thing as Shatner is a strangely likable guy despite his large ego. None the less its a must watch for any Trekkies and a solid watch for any sci-fi fanboys like myself. It will make you smile and maybe...just possibly bring a lump to your throat on the odd occasion.7/10

Nagused The best moments.... Shatner on convention floor with fans. Patrick Stewart interviews and interviews with Scott fun too. The recognition that fame is not worth the price of family... Very touching stuff!!!! Kate reminding me of the imbalance of parenting... She is awesome!Odd moments... Everything with Avery, my favorite Captain. Stoned? Or just weird? Discontinuity of editingBad moments... Crew...from bad cinematography to friggin annoying reflectors blinding the actors during the interviews (the gold reflector is for morning, not middle of the day ya doofases... oh and the piano underscore was too loud and far too dramatic. As others have said, such golden moments were missed to chat up memories, anecdotal stories, etc. but still, a must see for any trek fan for those great moments here and there :)

userseven There are several small issues with this production and there is the big one – Will Shatner himself. The documentary is driven in the end by the writer/director obsession with his own mortality – a legendary fact that goes beyond any Star Trek cultural movement boundaries. What this movie is about is Shatner's quest to find meaning and reassurance about the legacy of his work. A desperate cry for an epiphany that in the end comes across as fake and sad at the same time.The production seems amateurish and uninspired. The music is obtrusive and there is neither pacing nor great method. There is minimal structure, the interviews being chopped up and arranged depending on the subject in question. There is also a major flaw in the concept. Being a documentary about Star Trek captains it HAD to feature Chris Pine, the youngest of the bunch, with only a feature film in the Trek series under his belt, and not much of a career to boast on either. Subsequently his small segment is absolutely out of place and feels like a complete waste of time.Except for the Christopher Plummer bit – an absolute gem of a few minutes in this production - the rest of the "interviews" all seem a little bit strange. I don't think that Shatner resonates on the same wavelength with any of the coleagues he interviews. I may even go so far as to say that there isn't much show of mutual respect either. Except for a lot of mandatory and empty exchange of praises, of course. In contrast when you have these two old friends, Shatner and Plummer on the same room it just clicks, naturally and beautifully, but the moment comes and goes very fast.I'm also terribly disappointed with the amount of time this film wastes on the interview with Avery Brooks, that seemed smoked out of his mind. And by interview I mean Shatner and Brooks exchanging a lot of metaphysical mumbo-jumbo and singing along around the piano like schoolgirls. I just don't have the stomach for this amount of naiveté.This was even more disturbing considering that at the same time Jonathan Frakes and Robert Picardo appear in the film with one liners basically. OK they were not "captains" but Kate Mulgrew was. And she really seems to have a thing or two to say about Star Trek, career, family and loss, and she is dismissed very quickly. Furthermore the little screen time she had is lost on stupid dialogues like "is it possible to be a female captain on the bridge of Star Trek?", "I was, so it's possible", "so it's impossible but you did it"... what?!That being said there are good things about this film. At least Bakula, Mulgrew and Stewart have something to say when questioned, about any topic, more or less related to Star Trek or acting and life. Patrick Stewart especially has a few surprising moments of openness. At a point I think he was even a little bit choked up remembering things. And you don't even need to be a trekkie to appreciate what these people have to offer.Unfortunately this was a "feature length" film and that is just not enough to even attempt to poke at their minds and life/career experience. I really hope Will Shatner has some 9 hours of footage on his editing room floor with these people, and he will came back with another version of this film, somewhere in the future. Otherwise these actors were disturbed for far too little.

Norman Cook This documentary is a series of interviews, actually conversations, between iconic actor William Shatner and the other actors who have played Star Trek captains. Jetting around the country, Shatner talked with Patrick Stewart, Captain Picard from Star Trek: The Next Generation, Avery Brooks, Captain Sisco from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, Kate Mulgrew, Captain Janeway from Star Trek: Voyager, Scott Bakula, Captain Archer from Enterprise, and Chris Pike, Captain Kirk from the 2009 Star Trek movie. Interspersed with the interviews were clips from a Star Trek convention Shatner appeared at in Las Vegas, where he met other Star Trek actors, including Rene Auberjonois, Jonathan Frakes, Robert Picardo, Connor Trinneer, and Nana Visitor, among others. Shatner also had a short interview with his old friend Christopher Plummer for whom he understudied at the Shakespeare Festival in Stratford, Ontario early in his career and who played the villainous Chang in Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991). The only really obvious omission was Leonard Nimoy.This documentary was fascinating in how it revealed as much about Shatner as his subjects. Topics ranged from how they got started acting, to how each actor got their Star Trek role, to how the Star Trek experience changed their lives and affected their families, to philosophical musings on death, and many things in between. Most of the captains are classically trained stage actors who weren't necessarily immediately onboard with playing a science fiction character for TV. Bakula and Brooks both have extensive musical backgrounds, Bakula as a singer and Brooks as a jazz pianist. In fact, Brooks provided the documentary with a pleasing smooth jazz score.All of the captains came off as intelligent, hard working, and frank. It was nice to see that they all still took their roles seriously and were truly humbled by the fan reactions to their work. Shatner, especially, seemed genuinely moved when he found out that the Canadian head of Bombardier Aerospace was inspired to take up aerospace engineering from watching Shatner on Star Trek. There was also a poignant scene at the convention where Shatner greeted a young wheelchair-bound man whose devotion to Star Trek seemed to be about the only thing that kept him going. The interview with Stewart seemed to have the most resonance. It was obvious that there was genuine rapport between him and Shatner. When they talked about how the long hours playing their roles negatively impacted their marriages, it was heartbreaking. Mulgrew's take on being a single mother during her tenure as captain was also touching.Shatner turned out to be an excellent interviewer. He kept things light and often humorous, such as when he conducted Pine's interview at a card table on a busy intersection or when he met Mulgrew sitting in a cardboard box. This allowed him to get his subjects relaxed and able to open up about some of the deeper questions. Shatner used his personal experiences to draw out measured responses from the other captains. Shatner has a reputation for being egotistical and antagonistic, but none of that was evident here. Maybe time has mellowed him out.The Captains is a journey of discovery for Shatner that is an enjoyable look at the world of acting in general and the Star Trek universe in particular. It is a sincere glimpse into the heart and soul of Star Trek.