SpuffyWeb Sadly Over-hyped

ChicRawIdol A brilliant film that helped define a genre

Whitech It is not only a funny movie, but it allows a great amount of joy for anyone who watches it.

Joanna Mccarty Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

MBunge Well, this low-budget-and-made-with-less-talent flick does have a good number of reasonably attractive women getting buck naked. That's largely offset, however, by the fact they're filmed with all the grace and eroticism of an industrial safety video for sewage plant workers. And despite all that nudity, there's only one halfway decent sex scene in the whole production. But I have to give writer/director Christopher Robin Hood credit for stocking his movie with a lot bare female flesh, because that's the only cotton pickin' thing this wet fart in a hurricane has going for it.Let me be blunt. The Casino Job is almost as low as you can go on the scale of motion picture quality. The only way something could be more poorly made than this would be if the entire film was out of focus and the soundtrack was non-stop white noise. The camera work here is brutally simplistic. The plot could be mistaken for a dog turd. The dialog has all the flair of a UPS truck. And the acting…oh, sweet Mary! The acting here is so bad that is you put this DVD on the shelf next to Glengarry Glen Ross, it would transform the Mamet masterpiece into Ernest Goes to Camp and turn Jack Lemmon into Jim Varney. I am not exaggerating for effect when I say this cast could not have done a worse job if car batteries had been hooked up to their genitals and they were randomly shocked while on screen. Oh, and for some reason, most of the dialog had to be redubbed after shooting was concluded, so when everybody talks they look and sound like Andie MacDowell in Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes.This is a Las Vegas heist movie, sort of like Ocean's 11 if 11 stood for the combined IQ of the filmmaker and his performers. A crew of strippers decide to ruin a casino boss, for reasons I won't bother getting into, and concoct a stunningly idiotic plan to do so that revolves around the strippers all being heartless whores and the people working at the casino all being blind and retarded. The plan works (surprise!) and the movie ends with the strippers all boinking various other characters, only to have another conclusion tacked onto the end of that which appears to have been an attempt to set up a sequel. If such a sequel is ever made, I will to go the home of Christopher Robin Hood, pour five gallons of kerosene over myself, ring the doorbell and when Mr. Hood answers, I will grab him in a bear hug and light a match.This movie sucks, and not at all in an entertaining way. It's like driving through Nebraska. There's nothing to react to and you can only hope you don't die before making it to the other side. The Casino Job is another example of cinematic fraud being perpetrated on the public. I suppose you can't blame Christopher Robin Hood, his cast or crew. Everybody wants their big show business break. But this piece of crap wouldn't get a passing grade in a community college filmmaking class and somebody still decided to put it out for unsuspecting people to buy or rent. That person needs to be sent to federal prison and made to bunk with a large gentleman named Jerome.

fotie444 To be fair, I'll start out with the bad then go on to tell you why I LOVE this flick. Yes, it's clearly a no-budget film and a couple of the actors are weak. Yes, there's ample gratuitus nudity which will make the prudes squirm in their seats. The reasons I loved it are: it's clearly a no-budget film and there's ample gratuitus nudity! I was never bored as it kept moving at a nice pace and enough skin was thrown in to keep in interesting while waiting of the big robbery at the end. The girls were hot (well, all but the one who ended up bedding the hot blonde at the end) and they all got naked. Too many movies like this promise skin on the box or preview and let you down by not delivering. NOT the case here! Some really good laughs, too.Certainly worth the $7 to buy it used out of Redbox (but I wish I got the original case)!

Matt Sorpho We rented this movie and "21" as preparation for a trip to Vegas in a few weeks for our friend's wedding and bachelor party. We tried "21" first and got about, maybe, 30 minutes into it and had to shut it off. Too damn slow! How is a movie about Vegas that boring? So, we popped in this flick and, low and behold, it was damn good. Well, it certainly got us jazzed about going to Vegas anyway. We laughed our asses off in several spots, especially at the end and the movie makes you want to run out to Vegas and rob the casinos...or at least win big! My girlfriend is cool and would probably like it, but there is a lot of nudity, so bear that in mind if your girl isn't as cool as mine! I figure "21" probably cost $50 million to make and this film was probably $1 million and ten times better so I give it a big thumbs up.

mbentertainment I rented this last night and loved it. It's got a great story and although it's low budget it has its charm. If your expecting to see these girls get naked, that they do so it's a seven out of 10 for that alone. The robbery was very cleverly put together and seemed possible. The casino owner was a true sleaze ball, but he made it funny. Some of the acting was a bit wooden but, hey, the chicks were hot and naked so I'm going to let it slide. And I kind of expected that any ways. Over all, it's a good rental and it's exactly what you would expect from looking at the box. One last note the Russian chick from PLAYBOY was HOT as Hell.