Organnall Too much about the plot just didn't add up, the writing was bad, some of the scenes were cringey and awkward,

Aneesa Wardle The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

Fleur Actress is magnificent and exudes a hypnotic screen presence in this affecting drama.

Allissa .Like the great film, it's made with a great deal of visible affection both in front of and behind the camera.

blessedcjc-1 This movie was awful, the story-line was not developed or explained until the end. The cops only appeared in the first half when he shoots the man in Rose's office, after that, they kill a police officer and her sister and no one shows up as they ride into the sunset. Then the supposed twist comes up when she figures out he is the killer and suddenly he is no longer a crack shot but some inept buffoon who doesn't know how to aim. And she kills him, what will she do next, bury him in the fields. NO emotion, no police, just vengeance; for what he was protecting her. NO sense, too cheesy.

ikeybabe Wow, this movie was shockingly bad - so very, very bad! There were some quality actors here - folks who obviously participated in this film as a favor to someone (either that or they were being blackmailed). *Spoiler Alert* The script was chock-full of holes: a convicted felon (Grant killed 3 men right?) can not legally have a firearm, cops don't let civilians simply walk into a crime scene, there is absolutely zero chance the dude in the woods had the capabilities to make fake IDs and passports, when Grant and Rose finally find the man who disappeared (and he just happens to walk into a busy restaurant/bar) the logical step is to brawl with him, of course, and after shooting and killing a business woman and a cop there is absolutely zero chance you get to climb into your car and go home. The whole script was ridiculous and implausible. And, the acting was so awful - the wife of the missing man, the secretary in Rose's office, the bartender. The only positive thing I can say about this film is that the cinematography was well done and the music that played as the end credits rolled was cool.

butafallingleaf I expected more from Isaiah Washington. This review is in no way a disparagement towards him, it wasn't his choice to be casted alongside an overly emotional actress. The quality of the overly dramatic performance of his counterpart is what completely ruined the movie. It may have been a good movie, but it was as if they intended to make it with an other side of the tracks kind of undertone; a love story of a mysterious clairvoyant and a troubled, complicated convict. No and no. None of that computed. Lisa Anderson's performance was a disappointment and a reason to not even watch this film. She may be pretty, but she is way too much. Even for a clairvoyant, way, way too much. I give it a 3/10 because there are more than likely other films that are worse than this one, but not many.

albereinstein First off, let me say to the person who posted the comments about afro Americans and the Oscars,IMDb is about reviewing movies,not about slandering, black actors and ranting. Your post has nothing to do with this film which is really a good movie.The story is concise the flow is steady and the acting is up to par.The whole cast did a splendid job in their roles and Isaiah Washington was spot on. Tell me, what did Cuba Gooding Jr. And Wesley Snipes have to do with this film? Absolutely nothing. What did the Oscars have to with film? Absolutely nothing. I thinks its in really poor taste to slander people who professions are to entertain, so that we can review them about their work, nothing more. Anyway to those that wanna read a review about the movie, I loved this movie, it was very intriguing. Anyone who knows the Lord, will truly appreciate this film.