Supelice Dreadfully Boring

Peereddi I was totally surprised at how great this film.You could feel your paranoia rise as the film went on and as you gradually learned the details of the real situation.

WillSushyMedia This movie was so-so. It had it's moments, but wasn't the greatest.

Bluebell Alcock Ok... Let's be honest. It cannot be the best movie but is quite enjoyable. The movie has the potential to develop a great plot for future movies

bandw Given the premise of this story I think most people could come up with a script to equal or surpass the one in this movie. The premise has a boss of seventeen blue-collar employees present them with the decision to forgo their bonuses in favor of not laying off a particular woman. That woman is Sandra (Marion Cotillard) whom we get to know throughout the movie. Sandra is recovering from an episode of depression and is just coming back to work, only to find out about the vote where the majority of employees voted to keep their bonuses. That would send most any person into a depression, so Sandra is indeed in a tough situation, given her already delicate emotional state. Also, she has a husband and two young children and losing her job would have a devastating effect on the family. Feeling that her foreman had biased the vote by telling people that even if Sandra were saved, someone else would be fired, Sandra appeals to the big boss for a re-vote, and that is granted. From there the movie slips into low gear as Sandra tracks down her fellow employees and tries to convince them to vote in her favor. One after another we see her finding out where her colleagues live and going to their homes. She is seen, in *long* takes, walking, riding the bus, and being driven by her husband to the homes. What develops is pretty predictable. Some workers are swayed and some just feel that, given their situation, they cannot give up the bonuses they had worked for. We see how lower middle class people have a hard time of it and how varied their situations are.I guess that there are some bosses dumb enough to set up a situation like the one portrayed here. The way these decisions are usually handled is to make the proposition of forfeiting bonuses, or raises, in favor of keeping all the staff on board, rather than signaling out a specific employee. Some things did point to why Sandra might have been singled out though. She had been on sick leave for depression with her ability to function in question, and the remaining employees could take up the slack in her absence. I got the feeling that Sandra was not particularly well liked and was surprised by how little she knew about her fellow employees, particularly given there were only sixteen others for her to know. It's not surprising that this situation produced a lot of strong emotional reactions--jobs and money strike at the heart of people's lives.I like Marion Cotillard and feel she was good in this difficult role. Given that she is portraying a woman recovering from depression she has few highly dramatic scenes, so to appreciate her performance you have to key on her subtle reactions. The movie illustrates the difficulty in dealing with a depressed person and I vacillated between being irritated with Sandra's husband and his apparent insensitivity by goading his wife into painful situations that could easily send her back into full-scale depression. But then I had to realize what a delicate situation he was dealing with and moderated my opinion. Getting through this was a bit of a slog. I found my attention had to be restrained from wandering.

jtncsmistad Before seeing the French domestic drama "two days, one night" I was only cursorily familiar with Marion Cotillard's work. I am now richly informed.Likewise, little did I know that a movie about a blue collar wife and mother battling to keep her job as a rank and file factory floor worker could be enrapturing entertainment. Guess what? It can.Cotillard is completely credible in this Oscar-nominated performance as Sandra. She strikes nary a false note in a riveting turn as a woman struggling with severe depression as she strives to convince fellow employees to ditch their coveted bonuses so that she may continue to earn a living for her family and not be forced to take government handouts "on the dole". The fact that Cotillard, though a true natural beauty, went without any apparent make up for the bulk of the film only served to enhance the stark urgency and utter desperation inherent in her enormously daunting mission.And there is another aspect of "two days, one night" that especially appealed to me personally. As a big rock music fan, I found it delightful that the Belgian Director tandem of brothers Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne chose to include in their production a pair of scenes which cleverly communicate the inherent spirit and emotion of the genre in very different manners. The pair of classic songs featured from legendary pop and rock icons Petula Clark and Van Morrison instill a sense both of pathos and frivolity into the complex fabric of this chronicle examining the fight for human dignity and destiny.Never one to surrender the specifics as regards an ending, I will simply impart that "two days, one night" arrived at a conclusion that is at once as reasonably realistic as it is distinctly hopeful.Or to put it another way......Success and satisfaction do not always come to us in the forms in which they are pursued.

spencergrande6 This film is about the economics of the economy, the impact on its workers and the inhuman decisions one has to make to survive. It is also kind of an exploration about recovering from mental illness, but not completely. Ultimately its about overcoming.Other than its insane premise, unbelievable in its all too mundane believability, it is a mostly pat story arch told with "realism" and a splendid performance from Marion Cotillard and not much more. It feels like the premise was concocted first and the characters (and by extension the mental illness) and ending tacked on to make it workable.

TxMike I am a very big Marion Cotillard fan, I consider her one of a very small handful of really great female actors working today. So it was quite a treat for me to see her in this movie. She is Sandra and while we don't get much back-story it becomes obvious as the movie unfolds that she has had some medical issues, mostly related to insecurity and depression, and has been off her job as a blue-collar worker in some sort of plant. The plant has been suing 17 workers so when she had to take a leave they had to do the job with only 16. However during that time they apparently found that they only needed 16, so Sandra didn't really need to go back to work when she was well.However Sandra and her husband, Fabrizio Rongione as Manu, really needed her extra income, they had two children and neither of the adults earned a lot of money. But there was a vote at work, if they hired Sandra back then there wouldn't be enough money for bonuses of about 1000 Euro for experienced workers.And that is what this whole movie is about, can Sandra over the weekend, two days and one night, convince her co-workers to take another vote on Monday and choose to let her stay on while they forego their bonuses. Sandra doesn't really want to go talk to each one but Manu urges her on, almost forcing her to do it. A big part of the story arc is Sandra growing in her confidence and learning to approach people constructively. We see that the mostly older workers sympathize with Sandra and are reluctantly willing to give up the bonus while the younger male employees get mad at Sandra for causing trouble. They want their bonus!While I enjoyed it because Cotillard really is that good, I also can see how many viewers could find the movie somewhat dull and tedious. It is a character study, mostly of Sandra but also of her husband and co-workers. The DVD from my public library has a good 'extra' where the actors discuss their roles and what the story means. SPOILERS: Monday comes and Sandra has done her best to get 9 votes needed out of 16 to keep her job. But it is split 8-8 and without a majority she is asked to clean out her locker. But the boss calls her in, he says when September comes he can let go a fixed term worker and re-hire her, but she says 'no' because she doesn't want someone else to lose their job because of her. She walks away, even with a small smile, she will seek work elsewhere.