Develiker terrible... so disappointed.

ReaderKenka Let's be realistic.

Chirphymium It's entirely possible that sending the audience out feeling lousy was intentional

Arianna Moses Let me be very fair here, this is not the best movie in my opinion. But, this movie is fun, it has purpose and is very enjoyable to watch.

He_who_lurks In response to what the other reviewer said, I'd like to point out that the earliest adaptation of the Odyssey I've seen was made two years before, in 1902's "Le Jugement de Paris" which only briefly recreates a short scene from the beginning of the book. This three-minute film is a single scene representation of the story of Ulysses. I don't know the story myself, so I'm guessing that this brief interpretation is only part of it.The film begins with a realistic-looking (and quite beautiful) set of the entrance to a cave. Ulysses (played by Méliès, I think) enters the scene and falls asleep only to be discovered by some nymphs of the goddess Calypso who dance around him. Then, Calypso herself enters and lures Ulysses to the entrance of the cave, when she disappears. Ulysses then is stopped by a huge cyclops who 'threatens' to kill him so he has to fight the monster. The special effects here are extremely obvious that they just superimposed the actor's head onto the set (which could be understandable due to the limited technology at the time). However, what's worse is that while the cyclops does have a single eye, the other two actual eyes of the actor are just closed and it looks so obvious that it just looks like a huge guy's head with his eyes closed. I'm sure even at the time they could have found a way to create a more convincing effect. As it is, the sets and costumes look great and it's interesting to think why Méliès decided to adapt this particular story.

Hitchcoc Odysseus (Ulysses) is on an island and falls asleep. While a sleep, some maidens (sirens?) come upon him. They dance, play music, throw flowers on him (lotuses?). He awakens and they run away, except for one (Circe?). He pleads with her for some reason; maybe it's romantic; maybe he's under the spell of the flowers. Who should show up but a cyclops. The weak thing is that he has an eye on his forehead, but he has two other eyes. They are just closed. All we have is a head and Ulysses sticks a spear in his eye as all manner of ooze comes out of it. The story lacks any suspense and no real defense from the cyclops. Could have been much better.

ofpsmith Yes I'm reviewing yet another Georges Melies film. This one is Ulysses and the Giant Polyphemus(1905). It's the first ever film adaptation of The Odessy that I've ever heard of. This one is just about the famous part in the epic where Odesseyues is in the cave with Polyphemus the cyclops. It's an incredibly short adaptation, but then again this was 1905 when most films never got longer than 12 minutes. This time Odesseyues (I mean Ulysseus) is by himself. Also it doesn't even look like he's inside the cave at all. He does however stab Polyphemus in the eye like all the other versions. So it does have some relation. Overall if you are for whatever reason curious about an early adaptation of the Odessy (like I was) go see it. I saw it on YouTube by the way.

MartinHafer I am not 100% familiar with the story of Ulysses, so if you are a complete nut about mythology (like my oldest daughter), you'll probably get a bit more out this film than I did---but I was really impressed by it--even if it's very old fashioned compared to modern films. Still, the techniques, for their day, were exceptional--and cool! The film begins with Ulysses on an island and a bunch of nymphs dance about him. He awakens and is confronted by the ENORMOUS head of a cyclops (what happened to the rest of the body?!). He then proceeds to do battle with it--driving his sword into the eye of the cyclops--and all sort of disgusting pus-like stuff comes dribbling out and I had a great time watching! Gross AND pretty cool--especially since the enormous head effect was exceptional for 1905--way ahead of its time. Well worth seeing.