Interesteg
What makes it different from others?
Incannerax
What a waste of my time!!!
Supelice
Dreadfully Boring
Motompa
Go in cold, and you're likely to emerge with your blood boiling. This has to be seen to be believed.
josda2
The worst war movie I've seen, it is clear that the director has no idea how to make a war movie!, The performances are terrible, the list of errors are so extensive that denotes the null research on basic things as difference between a destroyer and a corvette, periscope image of a tanker ship is fail ; C47 with bombing view??,The ships that attack are not shown,the dialogs are poor, immersion procedures are incorrect,The costumes of the film is incorrect; the sailors behave like Italian mobsters It's so disastrous and poor that I can't finish her. Just friends or fake users can give 10 stars to this movie! Qualify with 1 because I can't give 0 stars Don't waste your time viewing this piece of garbage
William_Henry_Pratt
I originally thought this film was made by a bunch of 18 year old's at their parents beach home during the summer. It turns out the director is in his sixties! It looks like he got all of his 'extra' friends and made a 'film' if I can call it that. The acting is so amateurish they should have stayed extras and take an acting class or two. All the actors hair are blown dry, in the forties! The ridiculously banal script is by someone who did absolutely no research about the period or subject matter and looks like she never even met a human being. Characters talk endlessly about nothing to each other or telegraph the narrative in the worst way. The first rule of movie making is not to move narrative through dialogue. I don't think the writer ever studied any of the elements of writing and she plagiarizes a lot of other sources. This mess looks like something you'd see on YouTube. The D.P. knows absolutely nothing about lighting
ah I could go on but ultimately just because someone goes out and buys a Canon 5D doesn't mean you have to go out and make a motion picture. Everyone involved with this catastrophe should find another line of work.Crap.
HEIDIBOO
I've never written a review on here before but this movie is so bad I felt the need. Bad script, bad acting, bad effects and not even a real attempt to be even slightly accurate. I mean, any war movie would at least make some remote effort to ensure the uniforms have rank on them. The WWII "Destroyer" is a launch circa 1970's. Where would POW's on Sumatra get cigarettes from? The English accent is appalling, sounding more like an Australian. A Sub Captain would never leave the boat. Its clear no real research was conducted to make this even appear to be authentic. I watched all of 10 mins before I couldn't stand it anymore. You can certainly tell this is low low low low budget. Shame really because the storyline made out it could have been good. I really cant give it more than a one star.
robertbocelli
The Germans and the Japanese getting together for a little party. Well Pearl Harbor did wake up a sleeping Giant and now USS Seaviper has done the same. It is what the Silent Service did in World War II. It was the submarine service that broke the back of the Japanese navy and this film is a good chapter in that effort. The characters are real and delivered by actors that we are not familiar with great work. It is a breathe of fresh air to see actors other than the usual Hollywood faces, it makes it more realistic. I hope to see them in future films. High sound quality. I would like to know how they shot the submarine on the surface there are not many that are still sea worthy these days. The underwater stuff is obviously CGI work, but very well done, just enough to get the point on screen. Go see it, you will love it, some heart warming scenes TUTTI BRAVO!