Linbeymusol Wonderful character development!

Rio Hayward All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

Aneesa Wardle The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

Brennan Camacho Mostly, the movie is committed to the value of a good time.

MBunge There should have been a lot of gnashing of teeth and muttered resentments when this movie debuted, because Vice is the sort of dark, urban crime drama that a thousand filmmakers have tried to create. 999 of them fail, sometimes spectacularly so. This is that one success. It takes the Mel Gibson character from Lethal Weapon, strips away all the Hollywood artifice and then plunges him into a world of overlapping corruption and deceit. Featuring powerfully unadorned dialog, several excellent scenes where we get to see some gifted actors stretch out inside their characters' skin and broodingly strong direction that snaps into the offbeat at perfect, unexpected moments, this film could be just as appropriately titled "Virtue".Walker (Michael Madsen) is a narcotics cop beaten down and burned out to the point of nihilism. With a dead wife in his rearview mirror, he's either on the job, buried in a bottle or paying a hooker to stuff her hand down his pants. After an undercover drug bust goes wrong in more ways than one, the members of Walker's squad start turning up murdered and he has to team up with Salt (Daryl Hannah), the sullen, distaff member of the team, as both Feds and gangbangers start circling around like hungry sharks. With lies and the truth swirling around him until he can't tell which is which, Walker is left with nothing but bloody vendetta to see him through.Michael Madsen has spent most of the years since Reservoir Dogs recycling his performance from that film, to the point where he sometimes comes off like a standup comedian doing a Michael Madsen impersonation. Vice is a reminder of how outstanding that performance was and how good it can still be when it's channeled through a worthy script. He plays Walker as a man at the end of his rope who's surprised at how tightly he's still holding on. Daryl Hanna is also wonderful as Salt, letting the cop's wounded pride and desperate need to belong seep out of her every pore. Mark Boone Junior and Aaron Pearl only have one scene each where they get a chance to shine, but they almost steal the whole movie when they do.The best part of Vice, however, is its dissection of the partnership bond between police officers. Cops are required to put their lives in each other's hands, often in the hands of people they don't really know. It isn't a union based on choice or fellowship. It's built out of necessity and this film does a great job at delving into the forced, artificial nature of such a relationship and how some commit to it and some don't.Writer/director Raul Inglis does a frequently exceptional job. He crafts memorable dialog while avoiding anything that sounds overly intricate or false. He carefully shepherds along the central mystery of the story, which I didn't figure out until about 15 seconds before it was revealed, presenting it not as a puzzle to be solved but as an unknown to be navigated through. He also throws something different at the audience ever so often, an unexpected visual or narrative spark that keeps the viewer plugged in to what's going on.Now, some might be put off by the rather languid pace of Vice and not everyone in the cast is up to the standard of Madsen, Hannah, Boone Jr. and Pearl. Folks weaned on Tarantino and his legion of wannabes might also squawk at something that isn't hyper-witty or drowning in homage and aphorisms, but I think any complaints about Vice have as much to do with the viewer as they do with the movie.I enjoyed this film and how it never settled completely into any of the well worn grooves of this genre. Throw in some bare boobs, startlingly unexpected violence and a buck naked guy on a chain link fence, and Vice is definitely something people should see.

Literate_Fool Classic bete noire: The genre persists in many forms.Vice is not a "slow" movie, nor is it pedantic. Vice does require intense attention to each participant and the environment, as it should, for the writer and director show common people in extraordinary circumstances.Madsen and Hanna may not seem "common", but see them at the bottom of the ladder in their environment. The acting is exquisite, the sets sublime (in the sense that they disappear and yet contribute a force on the viewer), and all is wholly believable.Vice is paced to the stark reality of an undercover existence, of competing loyalties, of personal trust and values, of redemption. Best of all: It takes until the very end of this film, but there is resolution.A hard film, but well worth the effort.

dbborroughs Michael Madsen is a hard living cop that finds his crew dying after a drug bust goes wrong. Madsen does his best, but the film seems to get away from him. I don't know if its because he's not strong enough to be lead character but he comes off the worse for ware in a good but unremarkable film which requires little of him other than to talk tough and look mean which reciting meaningful narration. Actually I'm picking on the writing which is actually pretty good and I liked some of the pithy lines of dialog and philosophical narration. Actually the trouble is Madsen who just sort of stands there and broods in a leather jacket. Better is Daryl Hannah looking very good and mean with her hair dyed jet black. Good but not great, worth a look in mindless mode.

tomihlexx87 I picked this movie up at a mickey d's red box and i wasn't expecting anything special. I figured if it was i would have heard about it. What i got was an OK cop movie with a kick ass cast. Madsen was awesome especially in the overdubbed readings. It made me wish he would have been max Payne instead of mark. Hannah managed to look about 10 years younger and she played the shy girl cop very well. But what made the movie for me was the addition of Alex Krycek( nick lea ) from the x-files. That put a huge smile on my face. So what holds this movie back? Well the writing was pretty weak and the story had more than a couple holes. I liked the idea of a drug bust that changes everyones lives through paranoia and broken trust. The thing that really brought the movie down though was the surprisingly bad acting in some scenes. Mostly scenes with Hannah and Madden. The car scene where walker and Sampson get into an argument and walker says, "do you wanna f**k with me" was possibly the worst scene of Michael Madsens career. not a bad movie. You should see it just for Nick Lea and Madsen together.