Incannerax What a waste of my time!!!

Lucybespro It is a performances centric movie

Allison Davies The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

Kinley This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

classicsoncall This picture reminded of the 1932 programmer "Taxi!" starring Jimmy Cagney, but in reflecting on what happened in this one, it's a little baffling. I can see two rival cab companies going up against each other to try and steal the other guy's customers, but how does it work with a cab company versus a bus company? It's really two different types of customers, one presumably for the long haul and one for getting around town. Even back in 1940, I can't imagine a cab company being so hard up for business they'd have to knock off a bus company. It just doesn't make sense to me. Especially when you consider that both companies were vying for passengers on an LA to San Francisco run!But you know what floored me even more? When Ted Dawson (Fay Wray) took matters into her own hands to investigate possible sabotage on the part of the cabbies, she got a quote of four dollars to make the trip, and chiseled foreman Casey down to three and a half! How crazy is that? Things wound up a bit more believable at the finale with the reveal that the cab company was run by Ma Talbot (Leona Roberts), whose husband was fired by Federated owner Dawson (Oscar O'Shea) for stealing. Ma called the shots on when and where her goons would sabotage the buses causing them to crash, thereby creating a financial burden on Federated.Say, pay attention to that scene when Casey pays off Jerry Waters (Charles Lang) when he quit. Casey said he owed Jerry two dollars, but handed him more than two bills! But the better goof was when driver Donovan (Paul Guilfoyle) crashed his bus after a Federated thug ran him off the road. When Casey made his way into the bus, all the passengers were gone!!?? What!!?? Well even if a story doesn't have much going for it like this one, I get a kick out of that kind of goofy stuff that no one ever picked up on while making the picture. It always makes me wonder why no one thought things through to consider whether events written into the script were believable or not.

fredcdobbs5 Looking more like it came from "B" action specialist Breezy Eason at Warners than little-known Frank Woodruff at RKO, this quickie little time-filler about crooked limo drivers trying to drive a bus company out of business accomplished what it set out to do, no more or no less. The script is serviceable, at best, if too talky at times, and leading man Charles Lang--in only his second picture--is rather colorless and bland and has no chemistry whatever with star Fay Wray, though she tries hard. There's some action on the road, and if you're a vintage-car enthusiast you'll really like all the shiny new--at the time--Packards, Chevys and other models sprinkled throughout the picture, and there's a pretty good though brief brawl near the end. Wray is still as beautiful and sexy as she was seven years earlier in "King Kong" and, as other reviewers have stated, is probably the best reason to watch this picture. It's OK, nothing more, and a decent way to pass the time. Nothing special, though.

Michael_Elliott Wildcat Bus (1940) ** (out of 4) Warner made a crime picture about taxi drivers in the entertaining TAXI! so I guess RKO thought they'd push the envelope by making a crime picture with bus drivers. This film, however, is pretty dull from start to finish. In the film a playboy (Charles Lang) goes bankrupt so he has to get a job at a bus company ran by a woman (Fay Wray) and her father. The bus company has had all sorts of accidents that are ruining their company but they begin to think that it's racketeers running a taxi service that's trying to steal their business. This RKO picture runs a very brief 63-minutes but at times it feels doubt that length. The biggest problem is the rather bland direction that puts very little life into the picture. The screenplay really doesn't help matters either as all the characters are pretty one-dimensional and none are overly interesting. The bad guys are carbon copies of what you'd see in a Warner picture and the good guys are just boring and constantly saying bad jokes. Lang is okay in his role but the screenplay pretty much lets his character done as at times he's annoying and it's really hard to care too much for him. Wray is pretty much going by the numbers but once again, a lot of this could be blamed on the screenplay or direction. Paul Guilfoyle, Don Costello, Paul McGrath and Joe Sawyer round out the supporting players. There's very little energy to anything in the film as the entire story just feels forced and it's just not interesting enough to carry the short running time. The ending picks up a few punches as we get a big fight sequence with plenty of punches and kicks.

boblipton This rather poor RKO programmer manages to keep some interest going, mostly due to Fay Wray, who struggles with the poor material, but who is canny enough to make the most of her close-ups, and to Paul Guilefoyle who is pretty good is his supporting role as the hot-tempered moral center of the piece. Leading man -- actually, leading chump -- Charles Lang suggests, if anyone, a rather clueless Dan Duryea.The plot, about a struggling bus line, owned by Miss Wray's father and run by her, despite the efforts by wildcatters to put it out of business by faking accidents, has hints of screwball comedy about it at some points, but it is rarely played for laughs. Lang, the newly indigent ex-playboy, is down to his last limousine, which has its potential, but the effect is not funny, merely incongruous. Not a terrible piece to watch, but not to go out of your way for.