Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

Micah Lloyd Excellent characters with emotional depth. My wife, daughter and granddaughter all enjoyed it...and me, too! Very good movie! You won't be disappointed.

Leoni Haney Yes, absolutely, there is fun to be had, as well as many, many things to go boom, all amid an atmospheric urban jungle.

Isbel A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

davidviera-41167 Why just why Woody Woodpecker is just one of the best cartoon character was fun to watch back in 1940 but why does Brazil thought this would be a good idea to ruin a cartoon this popular by adding live action elements into it. It's just pointless with it's obnoxious poop jokes where one scene where a guy ate Woody's bird poop I literally threw up in my trashcan that's how this whole movie is it's just trash same thing with the acting seriously kids these days don't post stuff like #EpicDadGrillFail are you kidding me kids today talk stuff like fort-nite and stuff and how you people barley showed no effort into making this film when I first heard of this I thought this was a joke but no it actually happen like the CGI is so bad that Advertisement these days looks cinematic and cool like characters we could interact with in real life like the Super Mario Odyssey ads this movie's CGI looks like it was done by a high school-er and that's not saying much like it's dated to bring cartoons to life we all might as well stop watching bad films like this so they could learn to handle criticism and improve as the years goes by and P.S NEVER TRY TO MAKE ME WATCH THE KIDS WITH HORRIBLE ACTING IN THIS MOVIE EVER AGAIN OR ANY OF YOUR MOVIES!

benjaminsuey This film is god awful! The jokes are predictable, the characters are completely forgettable, there's stereotypes, cliched plot lines, bad effects, and just a living hell to sit through.

cliffordadamsii I have no idea why the writers found it necessary to start the movie with a broken family plot. Rich dad divorces mom and hooks up with younger sex object who needs a "Xanny" at one point. Why?! Dad is forced to take kid along on a vacation which really is dad trying to build a mansion in the forest. I think a key aspect of writing for kids is that the writers have kids. Are we targeting ages 4 - 7? 8 to 10? up to 12 years old (because they won't believe a woodpecker drummed on soup cans to produce Jon Bonham-esque sound).I feel sorry for anyone who had any role in this project, but mostly anyone who decided to watch it.Why? Just why.

Michael O'Keefe Yes, this is happening. Alex Zamm directs this live-action/CGI film wrapped around that once very popular character created by Walter Lantz...Woody Woodpecker. A big city lawyer Lance Walters (Timothy Omundson) comes across as a self-centered con artist that wants to tear down a piece of the forest to build a dream home. Not for him and his uppity girlfriend Brittany (Thaila Ayala) to live in; but to flip it for a fortune. Walters also is trying to bond with his estranged son (Graham Verchere). The red-headed Woody is going to become a nightmare when the amusing fights for territory begin. Taking down Woody's home is not going to be cheap. There seems to be an amateur look to the animation. Question: how is it that Woody can soar from place to place without flapping his wings? Nostalgia usually feels better than this. The voice of Woody Woodpecker belongs to Eric Bauza. Others in the cast: Chelsea Miller, Jordana Largy, Emily Holmes and Scott McNeil.