Wrong

2013
6.2| 1h33m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 25 March 2013 Released
Producted By: Realitism
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Dolph Springer wakes up one morning to realize he has lost the love of his life, his dog, Paul. During his quest to get Paul (and his life) back, Dolph radically changes the lives of others -- risking his sanity all the while.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

Realitism

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Maidgethma Wonderfully offbeat film!
Humbersi The first must-see film of the year.
FirstWitch A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.
Cody One of the best movies of the year! Incredible from the beginning to the end.
badweed-2 its a strange movie , but i liked it . it has sarcasm . i think it is made a bit with the same mode that rubber was produced. but more holistic ? more general than movies ? i have a few questions as you might found out , but one i think is most important . in the office where he did not work any more , the rain what was supposed to mean ? was that it rain or spit ? because it was a job to spit at ?
kulminaator If you need to take your mind off from something then this movie is definitely it. There's no doubt about it.The movie is a funny one, but not really meant for the minor viewer (some violent scenes and a lot of abstractionism that may not be suitable.I suggest you grab something to nab on and perhaps some lighter (or stronger) drinks to help this get along and get some good company.Do expect: a lot of wrongness, odd twists, funny jokes, morbid jokes, stuff that actually moves you if you own a pet, scenes where you don't know if to laugh or cry,Don't expect: an easy plot to follow. polite jokes or special effects.
ian-968-580479 This movie was a complete waste of time.Comedy class?? There were no funny moments.I have no idea how it has received a 6.8 rating by IMDb at the time of writing. I think anything higher than a 3 would be generous. 3 only because you can't blame the actors for their parts.I think just because a movie has some quirky characters doesn't mean it is good. The storyline should be at least interesting which in this case is far from close.If you have absolutely nothing else to do in the world…. Perhaps stare at a wall, after which I still wouldn't watch this movie.
blbl1 "Wrong" is the new absurdist comedy by Quentin Dupieux a.k.a. Mr. Oizo the French house DJ who serves as the director, the writer, the editor, the cinematographer and the composer. "Wrong" is the follow-up to the 2010 movie "Rubber".Jack Plotnick stars as a seemingly regular guy who wakes up one day to discover his beloved dog gone. With such a casual premise Dupieux sets out into a very weird journey, trying to deny everything the viewers would think they knew about storytelling. Through a series of bizarre encounters with increasingly insane characters and situations, the protagonist finds himself more and more lost, as the movie grows more and more illogical and surrealist. Jack Plotnick is well-suited for the role of a neurotic guy always on the edge of losing his mind.But don't be fooled, "Wrong" is not just about wacky characters and non sequiturs (even if it IS very funny). Dupieux never loses the satiric edge, the writing never feels boring or forced, instead it's always quite witty and original. To Dupieux life a nothing but a series of chaotic unpredictabilities, strange inconsistencies, pointless formalities and surreal misunderstandings, all rarely explored in your typical movie, and even if you don't quite share this almost paranoid notion, I think Dupieux' vision is so strong and ingenious, it's very hard not to embrace it.Wrong is a very unique movie that shows a lot of promise for Quentin Dupieux's future work. I'm actually quite excited to see what he does next, as I found this movie to be a surprisingly big improvement over his previous movie, "Rubber", especially in terms of writing. He really has found his unique style, which I could describe as Monty Python meets Michel Gondry.Verdict: a pretty funny movie.