Beystiman It's fun, it's light, [but] it has a hard time when its tries to get heavy.

Joanna Mccarty Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

Patience Watson One of those movie experiences that is so good it makes you realize you've been grading everything else on a curve.

Yazmin Close shines in drama with strong language, adult themes.

j-kirby247 Basic Story Guide: Everyone has asked the question: If such-and-such fought this guy, who would win? Well, this show puts these fighters to test. Two fighters from both the pre-gunpowder and gunpowder eras, they have their weapons tested, and then in a simulation run over 1000 times, the winner is the one with the highest score.Verdict:I kind of enjoyed this series for a while. I really did. I enjoyed the series because it was fun, not because I am a history major, or ancient weapons expert, but because of what I am looking for when watching T.V. which is entertainment. I don't care about the logic behind the stunt, as long as the stunt is good. I'll throw the B.S. flag if I have to, but I'll continue watching the movie. Kind of a round about way to say I just want to be entertained.But I really hate the announcer who does the whole David Wenham from 300 narration of the weapons. Overly exaggerating the weapons. Like saying "The Such-and-such spear, a three foot instrument of death." Two episodes later, "The some-screwed-up-tribes-name trident, a four foot razor sharp spear for maximum slaughter." But if that is not bad enough, the guys who wield the weapons for their fighter are just annoying. Pardon my language, but they are constantly pissing and moaning, complaining that their weapon is better. God, it is so annoying. Some muscle bound jock who is either a member of the army, or just some know-it-all, arguing that an ax beats their sword, or that a gun is more effective than the other guys gun.Either way I used to enjoy it, now it's just gotten annoying. And don't me started on season 3.5/10

larcondos This show is currently in it's 3rd season, and rightfully so. The show is full of action, blood, gore, and introduces you to many weapons, from modern times, to in the times before Jesus. Though it's information is not always precise, it gives you a general idea, and a showing of the battle. There have been several occasions where I disagreed with the outcome, but because they showed me the footage and explained their reasons, I can see where it comes from. While watching the show, several scenes from the final battle pops up and occasionally ruins the show for you. (Like in the Pirate/Knight Battle. It shows the pirate walk up to the knight which is laying on the floor, and shoot him in the face.) The battles are also sometimes outdated. Take the Pirate/Knight scenario. The Knight was the ultimate warrior of the 13th century wielding swords and bows. The pirate on the other hand, is still around today, and has the advantage of GUNPOWDER. In fact, guns decided the entire battle. But, the fact their battles are all constructed from 2 different civilizations which have never met before, it gives you that feeling of imagination.Bottom Line, the show is a great show to watch, and is recommended for anyone who loves to watch battles. But, don't go around yelling "HEY EVERYONE! US ARMY IS WAY BETTER THAN Vietnam!!! I SAW IT ON TV!" This show is purely for a simulation , and is not 100% accurate. Though every season they add new factors which make it more accurate, it will never be 100%.

therealcromar Explaining the premise of this show to someone is truly humiliating. I'd rather just not bring it up. For those who don't know, it's a "who would win" contest where they choose warriors from history who never had a chance to fight. Often times these warriors are separated by centuries or even millenia, but they try to make the matchups as fair as possible.It's a fun show to watch. Certainly the best part of the show is watching the weapon experts at work. The horseback archery from Attila vs Alexander, the blademaster from William Wallace vs Shaka Zulu, and the quickdraw and trick shooting from Jesse James vs Al Capone come to mind as some of my favorite moments.Unfortunately, it's got a lot of problems. They are very, very loose with historical accuracy, and often they do an awful job of picking weapons - especially with the modern day warriors. They rarely test armor and almost never test shields - only the Spartan and the Viking had a real shield test. The outcome is decided by a simulator which runs on magic, and the decisions are questionable at best.The choreographed fights are hit or miss. Some are thrilling, like Apache vs Gladiator, but some are downright stupid, like Roman Centurion vs Rajput Warrior, where the Roman throws his shield aside for no reason halfway through. They also rarely, if ever, show actions in the choreographed fights that match up with the tests or results.This is definitely "turn your brain off", guts, gore, and splodin'-style entertainment. Actually, who am I kidding? You already knew if you were going to watch this show when you read the synopsis. You are either the right audience, or you aren't.

mike-ryan455 Don't get me wrong. This ranks up there with my other low brow comedy shows on Spike like "1,000 ways to die." It's great for something to relax to, and watching people get splattered makes it all the more fun. But accurate it is not.Their firearms knowledge is ludicrous. For example, on the Yakuza vs. Mafia episode they stated the Yakuza used the Walther P-38 pistol. Yet the graphics they showed were of a P-08 Luger. These are two totally, totally different looking pistols designed close to half a century apart. They had the IRA carrying a Boer War period .455 Webley revolver and they touted its reliability over a Makarov. I own both. There is no comparison between the Makarov and the Webley. You can't hit the broad side of a barn with a Webley.They do not test uniformly. In the Yakuza vs. Mafia episode, the Mafia had six machine gun targets they had to hit with the Thompson. The Yakuza only had four they had to hit with a Sten. That gave the Sten an easier score. Worse still, they used completely different ways of testing the Russian hand grenade and the US hand grenade. Why not do something logical - put three pig carcases up in an enclosed room and see how each grenade does? It's a uniform test? I shouldn't expect too much from Spike. It's unabashedly guy TV, and I like that. But they could do a lot better job with a little more care.