Maria Trim
If i could vote 11 i would, this was one of the better period dramas i have ever watched. I found it on amazon as my friends kept telling me to watch it, they even cried when it finished I thought oh dear how sad people would get so upset over drama on t.v.Well errrrr, i was sucked in the first few minutes, my house deteriorated around me, as i sat and binged watched, thanked goodness i have a cleaner. I had to watch it, i was hooked and needed my fix of the family and all their friends and yes enemies. I loved some of them, hated some of them, and the ones i hated at the beginning i loved at the end, as their stories were told. I even got interested in history, and read up more of the battles of WWI and about the Spanish Flu, and had not realised that more people died with the flu between 40 and 50 million in fact then the war itself. The producers had done their research, as this flu did kill people very rapidly and most who died were younger it didn't seem to affect older people. I loved the intrigue, The Bates and their dramas, the scene with Anna was very risqué, and i read that the phone lines were jammed that night after her attack. I can see why as the drama was go good you felt you were living it, walking the halls of downton abbey, listening and evesdropping on the families, wanting to cheer at the good stuff and boo at the bad stuff, cry at deaths, and be sad and wring a hankie with tears. I wont say what it was all about there is enough out there to explain, just to say this, you MUST watch it, any other drama is just a poor quality copy of this. Its finished now i have watched it all, and feel like i have lost a family. I really do hope they have a reunion they should do. The Finale was brilliant and lots of things were settled, but i would love to see how they all get on. It also made me realise that snobbery and prejudice was just as rife downstairs as upstairs which was surprising but on reflection yes i can see that happening. I shall so miss the Dowager and Isobel, and the one liners from the dowager so aptly made just at the right time, comedy genius, Maggie Smith the actress simply devine. I actually feel lost now, and might start to watch it all over again, oh dear do you think I need help lol.
Teyss
"Downton Abbey" has many qualities, which have already been highlighted: splendid period reconstitution, mix of historical events and individual stories, consistent central plot with ramifications, multiple character focus, witty dialogues, excellent acting, etc.This review (based on Season 1) analyses just one of them: how aristocrats and servants evolve in two parallel worlds that do not connect, yet present troubling similarities.1. DISCONNECTIONThe series manages to show two physically close environments as if they were on different planets. This underlines the disparities between social milieus in early 20th century Britain.Servants frequently go from the basement to the ground floor, however we never see them arriving there or leaving. This disconnection is first spatial: they sometimes start climbing the stairs, yet the camera never follows thoroughly (there are travelling shots following characters, but they always happen on the same storey). It is also temporal: we suddenly see servants on the ground floor without a link to previous action in the basement. Granted, there is a technical reason for that: all action on the ground floor and above was shot on site (Highclere Castle, UK), while action in the basement was shot in Ealing studios, since the castle's basement was not suited for period settings. Nonetheless, it would have been easy to film the servants going up the stairs in the studio and then edit their arrival on the ground floor (or conversely), which the series never does.Likewise, we see servants in above floors (aristocrats' bedrooms and servants quarters), yet never witness them arriving there. We do see them in the side staircase, but never going from there to the different levels: it is as if these stairs were separate quarters disconnected from the rest of the castle. Stairs could represent the possible link between servants and aristocrats (below versus above), but are denied their symbolic connection since they seem to lead nowhere. Here the reason cannot be technical as for the above topic, since the stairs are effectively located in the castle.Lighting on the ground floor and the aristocrats' bedrooms is generally bright, while in the basement and the servants' quarters it is always dim. Naturally, this can be explained by the windows sizes, however the contrast is pushed to the extreme: on cloudy days, the aristocrats' levels could be grim which rarely happens, while on sunny days the servants' levels could be bright which never occurs. Moreover, in the aristocrats' levels, colours are generally warm (yellow, red, white), while in the servants' levels they are usually cold (grey, brown, blue).Camera movements in the aristocrats' levels are fluid, poised, lengthy, while in the servants' levels they are brisker, faster, shorter. In the basement, the camera is frequently hand-held, highlighting the intensity of the work performed. Also, there sometimes is a character or an object in the foreground while action occurs in the background: we seem to bump into elements. The use of long lenses (foreground is blurred, background is sharp) increases this sensation of confinement. By contrast, in the aristocrats' levels, image is generally sharp.*** WARNING: CONTAINS SPOILERS ***2. SIMILARITIESDespite the symbolic gap between them, aristocrats and servants sometimes experience similar events. The message seems to be: regardless of social differences, we are all humans, with joys, grieves, qualities, flaws and secrets. Here are just a few examples (I will refer to characters either by their first or last name, depending on what is most common in the series).Servants are all decent, with two notable exceptions, who are real "villains": O'Brien and Thomas. Aristocrats are all decent, with two notable exceptions, who are real b**ches: Edith and Mary (although Mary reveals herself as more complex towards the end of Season 1).Servants cannot marry because of their function: Mrs Hughes turns down her lover; Carson is a long-time bachelor; the love between Anna and Bates remains chaste. The Crawley daughters cannot marry: Mary turns down pretenders including Matthew, who then turns her down; Edith is turned down by Anthony Strallon; Sybil is still young.William loves Daisy, who loves Thomas… who prefers men. Edith loves Matthew, who loves Mary… who does not love anybody. Both settings progressively evolve, however they occupy most of Season 1.Bates has a complex and shameful past: war, alcohol, thievery, jail. Mary has sexual relations before marriage, which was scandalous at the time, especially for an aristocrat; and it provoked the death of her lover Kemal Pamuk. All these terrible secrets will progressively be revealed.Various lesser intrigues between the aristocrats are echoed with the servants, and conversely. For instance: Thomas sends a letter to compromise Bates; Edith sends a letter to compromise her sister Mary. Gossip is widespread between the two milieus and within each.-----On both above topics, "The Rules of the Game" (Renoir, 1939) greatly influenced the series as well as "Gosford Park" (Altman, 2001), written by Julian Fellowes himself. Yet "Downton Abbey" manages to create a specific atmosphere, distinct from these two movies.If I had to rate Season 1 compared to a cinema feature, I would probably give it 7/10: despite all its qualities, it does have some downsides. Characters are Manichean. It triggers easy emotions. Some events are far-fetched (e.g. the feud between Mary and Edith, Kemal's heart attack). It mostly shows early 20th century as good old times and aristocracy as a benevolent power. The worst villains are all non-aristocrats: O'Brien, Thomas, Carson's ex-stage partner, the drunken mob at the suffragette rally.However, most of these drawbacks can be explained by the series format, which generally requires simplification to maintain attention on the long term. Hence as a series it probably rates 9/10 for all the qualities briefly described at the beginning of this review. The final rating 8/10 is an average of the two: entertaining and convincing but not essential.
