ChikPapa Very disappointed :(

Matrixiole Simple and well acted, it has tension enough to knot the stomach.

CrawlerChunky In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

Hattie I didn’t really have many expectations going into the movie (good or bad), but I actually really enjoyed it. I really liked the characters and the banter between them.

stuartplunkett In my view Dr Iain Stewart is greatly under estimated. He has a wonderful persona and in this particular series comes across as good as Attenborough. Earth: Power of the planet is quite possibly one of the greatest TV series I have ever seen. It takes us on a journey through the complex development of our planet, all the way from its explosive birth to the present time. It is exciting, yet sobering at times and explains everything on a level anyone can understand. Each of the 5 episodes gripped me from start to finish and I never get bored of watching them over and over.Its the kind of series that proves how lucky mankind are to even be in existence and that as complex the procedures it took to get us here, nature has the power to quickly take it away in a blink of an eye. 10/10 for me!

skoyles Stewart's series makes a perfect companion to the Plant Earth, Blue Planet, etc multi-pack of DVDs I recently purchased. What a marvelous and enjoyable experience it is to see the power of the Earth's physical properties. I will confess that I enjoyed the narrator's accent (much like my Mother's, though she insisted she had no accent)and his enthusiasm. Certainly it lends a different flavour when compared to David Attenborough's more mature tones. The use of extraordinarily clear computer graphics are startling. I found the size of the sphere made of all the water on Earth compared to the dry globe one of the most frightening sights ever. There is very little water by volume while I note that my conditioning was based on globes and maps showing area covered by water. Quite startling. I highly recommend this series.

rhinocerosfive-1 Guinness record frontrunner for repetition of the word "planet", Iain Stewart invites negative comparison to the BBC parody characters of Terry Jones or Eric Idle. Stewart's manic vocal and physical mannerisms, a desperate and fawning attempt to entertain, are like those of a man talking to a dog, or a baby, or a roomful of bored teenagers. But he's talking to me, a voluntary participant, so his elongated vowels and gratuitous glottal stops are insufferable. Attenborough, where art thou? Stewart's presentational performance is unfortunately mirrored by the awful kindergarten patter he's written for himself ("Here, it's on a tiny scale. But here, it's on a massive scale!"). You know, TV is a visual medium. If I can see what you're seeing, you don't have to jump up and down when you tell me about it. In fact, you probably don't have to say anything. But Stewart's voice would be too much even for radio. Showing me some giant ripples, he says, "These are giant ripples." Okay, let me try: That is a frenzied Scot. This is the sound of me turning off the television.While there is a quantity of interesting and useful science here, much of it goes bald and unexplained. I'm told that the moon controls the tides, but that without the moon the tides would happen anyway. Huh? (His failure to mention the tidal role of centrifugal gravity, if I didn't already know about it, would leave me, um, on the dark side of the moon. Sorry.) I'm also informed that without the moon, the earth would be subject to vast and sudden shifts of temperature. Okay, but how? Why? And while there is some nicely interpolated photography and computer graphics, it's all undercut by bewilderingly pointless shots of our hysterical narrator slogging through snow, or strapping into a jet, or yelping, "I can't believe it's fire coming out of ice!" In keeping with their star's overexcited persona, the producers score the show with sudden generation-y music cues a la "Hard Copy" or one of those "extreme video" programs. Or a movie by McG. The recipe is simple: replace missing drama with canned prefabricated rock music. A child could do it. An adult would be insulted by it.Worst of all, over the course of five episodes, I am introduced multiply to the same phenomena (three times each to stromatolites, and to the role of carbon dioxide in temperature regulation), each time as if I've never heard his identically worded description before over these same graphics. Sometimes in this same episode. But Stewart tries to make up for these redundancies by reminding me that what I'm seeing is "amaaazing!... remaaarkable... the mooost... the greeeatest... look at that!" What are we, four? Take a bromide, Dr Stewart, and call me when you've calmed down.

bootlebarth It's a revealing indication of the times we live in that hundreds of comments are made on idmb about nonsensical Hollywood blockbusters, but only one - before this - on an exceptionally interesting television series about the history and future of our planet.Presenter Iain Stewart takes us on a tour of the forces that have shaped the earth over the last four and a half billion years: volcanoes, atmosphere, ice and oceans. A basic understanding of the material shown should be part of everyone's education.The worst aspects of the five part series are the visual intrusions made by the over- enthusiastic presenter. He flaps his hands, twists his mouth into many strange shapes, and speaks in a Scottish accent strong enough to require sub-titling (not provided) for many English speakers.There are also too many of the rapid cuts that seem to be standard fare these days, as directors assume that viewers have the attention span of a goldfish unless bludgeoned into wakefulness by flashing images too rapid to see properly.Behind the flaws lies a wealth of information, often accompanied by startling images. The crater of an Ethiopian volcano shows, on a tiny scale hugely accelerated, the same features as the shifting of land masses as the tectonic plates separate and clash because of the forces from the molten core. A man jumps from a plane and surfs the atmosphere, illustrating that air is a fluid. We see irrefutable evidence of the shrinking of glaciers and the potential for melting permafrost to release methane, a far more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere.If we don't already know, we learn that Earth was completely icebound for millions of years, that ice ages have come and gone, that the Mediterranean has repeatedly disappeared when land movements closed the Straits of Gibraltar, that the global oceanic currents have stopped again and again causing massive extinctions, and much more.The final episode explains how unusual and possibly unique our planet must be despite the billions of stars in our own galaxy and the billions of galaxies elsewhere. There are plenty of references to climate change that might be the result of human activity, but life on earth will survive with or without modern homo sapiens.Never mind the irritations. 'The Power of the Earth' is a fascinating, alarming, reassuring and chastening series. Maybe it could have been done better, but it's good enough to be seen by anyone with an interest in history, the extraordinary ability of homo sapiens to understand the universe, and the shape of things to come.