Evengyny Thanks for the memories!

Softwing Most undeservingly overhyped movie of all time??

Cleveronix A different way of telling a story

Sharkflei Your blood may run cold, but you now find yourself pinioned to the story.

Bele Torso If you want to watch this show, go to: moviesonline (dot) mx and search for it. The quality is far from HD, but you will get the entire series. This is a very good TV and is horribly dated. The theme music is like nothing you will hear ever it is that bad. Many of the story lines are average and the acting as well, but this is an intelligent show. It is worth viewing just for John Houseman's performance. It is next to impossible to believe he is not a Harvard contracts law professor. Outside of Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter, Houseman is perfection in every scene. The content is also intelligent even though its presentation (acting, editing) isn't great. If you can get past how dated it looks, you will find many of the topics relevant today and looking back historical. Take S1 Ep 11 titled, The Sorcerer's Apprentice. Again, it is poorly executed by today's standards, but the idea of women as clerks and women's liberation mimics sexism today with the 'Me Too' movement currently happening. This episode was filmed in 1978 and fast-forward 40 years and the same conflicts are present. This show gives a realistic account of how personalities are shaped and formed. It presents the humanity of law school and inhumanity. How tribes are formed and allegiances catered to. You can think of Hilary Clinton or Barrack Obama in law school, seeing the before rather than the after. Of course we witness how technology radically has changed lifestyle. No computers of cell phones, no internet so research was books and libraries. Time was slower yet the stress as great. Check this show out if you can.

bpatrick-8 I spent a short time in law school about a year before the CBS version of "The Paper Chase" started. I'm not sure law school is as intimidating today as it was in the '70s, but it was pretty accurate at the time. Still, I would not care to see this show revived in a softer classroom environment, and for one reason: John Houseman. He actually did teach acting at UCLA drama school, and a student once told him he wasn't acting in "The Paper Chase," that that was really his classroom manner. And as for his character, Professor Kingsfield, yes, he can strike fear in his students, but at the same time, when he allows himself a small smile after a particularly good class, you know he's rooting for his students to make it into the legal world. Personally, I think that if there were more Kingsfields at real-world colleges (and even high schools), we wouldn't be talking about a crisis in education in this country.I also want to single out James Stephens, who I thought was a more credible Hart, the Midwestern kid who idolizes Kingsfield, than Timothy Bottoms in the movie; Bottoms seemed to be the last of the hippies. I also liked the fact that the series rarely, if ever, got into the relationship between Hart and Kingsfield's daughter, the subplot of the movie. There are some shows ("Law & Order" was another) where viewers don't care about the characters' personal lives.It's been noted that "The Paper Chase" was slotted against the two hottest shows of the era: "Happy Days" and "Laverne & Shirley." CBS may have been hoping for an alternative audience, much as "The Waltons" achieved against Flip Wilson a few years earlier. Thus, some of the episodes were flashier than "The Paper Chase" should be; the nadir was the one where Hart escorts a visiting Russian gymnast; Houseman refused to appear in that episode.Finally, like the similar "White Shadow," which was on CBS around the same time, these students do graduate! And as Houseman himself might say, they've won Kingsfield's respect the old-fashioned way: they've earned it.

lrcdmnhd72 I tend to agree with ClassicSteve about his comparison between the original 1973 movie, "The Paper Chase," and the TV series "The Paper Chase." I found the 1973 movie to be much more powerful, intense and convincing than the TV series, which seems to pale in comparison to the original 1973 movie. In fact, I think the movie version is much more realistic and convincing than the entire TV series put together. While some of the TV episodes weren't too bad, overall, the TV series, when compared to the original 1973 movie version, appears to be watered down.John Houseman seemed to slow down quite a bit in the TV series, especially in the later years as opposed to the movie version. Although his age may have had something to do with it, I think that lower quality scripting may have played a bigger role.In the TV series, I think I caught at a mistake. Rita Harriman wanted to be the first president of the Harvard Law Review, but if I remember correctly, there was a woman president of the Harvard Law Review that hit Hart with her car while he was riding his bicycle during his earlier law school years.Although I never went to law school, the 1973 movie version of the PC reminded me of my college years in acquiring my bachelor's degree. I tend to identify myself with Kevin Brooks (the guy with the photographic memory) and his inadequacies. His part reminds me so much of myself that, in real life, I think I could have been his understudy. Anybody that wants to undertake any worthwhile endeavor should watch the 1973 Paper Chase movie. It clearly shows the weed-out process and the high price that has to be paid for success.

classicalsteve I know there are a few die-hard fans making posts here. But after reviewing the show for the first time in 30 years on DVD, I do see why it was canceled. Not even Houseman can save this over-acted and badly-written show that is much weaker than the original film where the dialog is predictable, and the incidences are rather contrived. And of course, the whole feel of the show is so stylistically entrenched in the era of the 1970's, from music that sounds like imitation Simon and Garfunkle right down to the old freeze-frame at the end, that it gives the impression that it was too targeted for a 1970's TV audience that liked idealizing college days. In other words, it relies so heavily on the perceived 1970's sensibility that it can't break out of its own era while the film easily stretches decades beyond without it seeming like it was from the 1970's. This may be why broadcast television shows have a higher likelihood of being dated than films.The original film of 1973 has a more convincing look and feel to it that is entirely its own. It is modern but is not cemented to its era, similar to films like "Ordinary People" or "A Few Good Men" which seem somehow timeless. Probably the only differences between Harvard Law of 1973 versus Hardvard Law of the 2000's is that in the latter scenario the students have laptops, course assignments can be received via email, and case books can be acquired via CD-ROM--superficial upgrades. Students still attend large lecture halls and study in the law library containing tomes dating back centuries. The substance is still largely the same, and a prospective law student would still absorb much of the atmosphere of Ivy League law if he/she saw the 1973 film. Unfortunately the TV-show doesn't quite measure up.Comparing the casts of the TV show with its counterpart in the movie is kind of like comparing college football to the NFL. All the actors in the film took their acting down just a notch into the acting realm where it seems more genuine, more true-to-life, and more compelling. For my money, James Stephens was not nearly as convincing in the lead as James Hart as Timothy Bottoms from the 1973 offering. Bottoms finds that fine line where he has an understated intensity that emerges in a few crucial scenes, particularly in the moment where he confronts Kingsfield on his own terms. Stephens plays Hart as too much of a softy, the total nice college guy from the 1970's, replete with plaid shirt and an "ah shucks" kind of easy-going persona. Stephens lacks the intensity you would find among law students, the intensity that is captured very well by the film. In fact most of the cast of the TV show seem way too nice to be law students. Harvard law students are not only competing for grades but aspire to become leaders among the world elite and possibly enter politics. Not members of the Glee Club about to embark on a public relations tour.The actor who played Willis Bell in the original film, Craig Richard Nelson, does a fine job of making his character snooty and haughty although it never feels like it's so over the top that he's acting the part. Every college class has someone like Bell whose been given everything since before birth and acts like everyone else is dirt under his feet. By contrast, the actor who played Bell in the TV show, James Keane, misses the mark and his performance skyrockets into over-the-top-dom. Especially in the second episode when Bell's lobbying for a job, he came off like a science major who decided to try an acting class. It just doesn't work. The same could be said of the two Fords. The Ford of the film came off like a true law student, not particularly sociable but not unfriendly--the true studious intellectual engrossed in the case book. By contrast the Ford of the show comes off like this hot-head people-pleaser who wants everyone to vote for him in the second episode. And unfortunately, the hot-headed-ness starts to climb Mt Everest.It is not only the actors' fault. The writing of some of these episodes are just not on par with the original film, although some scenes and/or lines from the movie were used in the pilot. Some of the lines of the show are so ridiculously contrived I was almost rolling over the floor, especially when Stephens was in Kingsfield's office during the pilot episode, saying "But but Professor Kingsfield..." in a last-ditch effort to gain some sort of footing in the class. Sort of akin to the line "Why why you you...!" I have never heard anyone actually say these kinds of lines except in movies and TV shows.Ultimately a let-down as I vaguely remember the show when it first aired (I was in Elementary School at the time), but I never watched it religiously. I acquired the original film "The Paper Chase" not long ago and decided it would be fun to see the TV series. Unfortunately it falls flat. I rest my case.